For Immediate Release
For More Information Contact:
Chris Christensen, Vice President, Public Relations
One Stop Real Estate Shopping
For immediate release. In it’s May 23 testimony to the Senate
Banking Committee, the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance (AHGA)
urged Congress to support the entry of banks into real estate markets. The
contentious issue has pitted banks against real estate brokers. As a
result of federal legislation passed in the previous Congress, new
regulations to allow banks to offer real estate services are pending. Real
estate brokers are supporting legislation to repeal the part of the
previous law.
AHGA, a national bipartisan advocacy organization representing the nation’s
70 million homeowners, sided with the banks on this issue. AHGA believes
that homeowners and home ownership are generally benefited by domestic and
international free market policies.
AHGA carefully reviewed policy documents and testimony from the real
estate and lending sectors and other sources on the issue of allowing
banking organizations to be involved in real estate brokerage. From the
consumer perspective there are significant potential benefits of such a
policy. Those benefits clearly outweigh the limited potential risks. In
addition a substantial majority of consumers would like the option of “one
stop” shopping for real estate services.
Real estate interests argue that because banks lack the invaluable
experience in local real estate markets and the in-depth knowledge of real
estate law, consumers will suffer. While it’s true that most banks
currently don’t have core real estate brokerage competencies, both
experience and common sense suggest it is unlikely that consumers will
suffer. Companies in the banking and real estate sector have successfully
entered each other’s markets without serious problems. Federal savings
institutions, credit unions nationwide, and commercial banks in about half
of the states have had the ability to engage in real estate brokerage for
a number of years. Many real estate companies, including Long &
Foster, Century 21 and Coldwell Banker and many others currently provide
brokerage, mortgage lending, title insurance, and property insurance.
Consumers have substantial protection in the fact that real estate
practice is heavily regulated, and state licensing requirements establish
minimum competencies that all participants must demonstrate. Rather than
build those competencies from scratch, it is likely that many banks will
enter the real estate brokerage market through partnerships with or the
acquisition of small local real estate agencies that have substantial
experience in their real estate markets and in-depth knowledge of real
estate law.
Another argument against permitting banks to enter real estate
brokerage is that it will accelerate the consolidation process currently
underway in both the real estate and lending sectors. This would reduce
competition and increase costs to consumers. This is not a strong argument
either. Other larger economic factors are driving the consolidation that
will almost certainly continue in banking and real estate (and many other
sectors as well), whether or not banks are allowed to enter real estate
brokerage. AHGA believes that any contribution of this new policy to the
consolidation process will be small. If banks are permitted to enter real
estate brokerage the most visible difference will likely be that banks
instead will purchase some of the small real estate brokerages that would
otherwise be purchased by large real estate brokers. Because there will be
more bidders the small independent brokers will benefit from higher
selling prices when they sell their businesses. Fortunately there are a
very large number of existing competitors in both sectors, so it would
take many years before consolidation reduces the number of competitors in
either sector to the point that any company or small group of companies
could override market forces in determining prices of banking and real
estate services. If and when we ever reach the point that market forces do
not prevail in setting real estate service prices and lending prices and
rates, U.S. antitrust laws are available to stop anticompetitive behavior.
Lastly, opponents argue that permitting banks to enter real estate
brokerage creates a conflict of interest in that a lender owning a real
estate brokerage will try to sell follow-on products or services to its
clients, and in many cases those products or services will not represent
the best value for the consumer. Most consumers recognize that the
products or services of only a few companies in a given industry can
represent the very best value for a particular consumer. They also
recognize that the consumer is in the best position to determine his or
her needs and priorities and it is the consumer’s responsibility to sort
out which products or services represent the best value. Cross-selling of
follow-on products is a very common practice in many sectors, and the
products and services a company seeks to cross-sell are no different with
respect to their potential fit to a consumer’s needs that the product or
service that attracted the consumer in the first place. AHGA believes that
most consumers are sophisticated enough to recognize that any company’s
follow-on products or services also may or may not be the best value for
the consumer and act accordingly. There is therefore no greater conflict
of interest between a consumer and business regarding a follow-on product
or services or the product or service that attracted the customer in the
first place.
In addition most consumers do substantial research regarding competing
real estate and mortgage lending services before buying, selling or
financing a home. There is a wealth of free and inexpensive information
available to consumers on those subjects from a wide range of sources,
including AHGA’s sister education and research organization, the
American Homeowners Foundation (AmericanHomeowners.org). Almost every
source strongly urges consumers to comparison-shop every major component
of real estate services.
There are several arguments in favor of permitting banks to enter real
estate brokerage. Businesses cross-sell because it is more efficient way
to market, i.e. the costs are lower. In a competitive marketplace a share
of marketing cost savings will inevitably be passed on to consumers in the
form of lower fees and/or rates. In addition to potentially saving
homeowners money, the closer coordination of home brokerage and lending
services under one roof also potentially reduces the time between purchase
and settlement, which can often be very important to consumers as well.
These likely cost and time savings are a substantial potential consumer
benefit. They would indirectly benefit individual real estate agents,
because they will get their commissions sooner and the reduced costs and
time savings will likely mean more home buyers and sellers.
Consumers are very concerned about the protection of their financial
and other personal data. Currently RESPA requires that all real estate
companies and banks provide customer disclosure of multiple services
offered by affiliated firms. In addition banks are currently subject to
greater privacy regulation than real estate companies. The current
regulatory proposal to allow banks to enter the real estate brokerage
requires real estate brokers to provide greater protection to the privacy
of consumer data. Consumers support this requirement and will benefit from
greater protection.
One stop shopping is by itself a substantial benefit to many
time-starved consumers. Many home buyers are couples with two demanding
jobs and often more demanding children. We believe many of those home
buyers consciously and intentionally trade convenience for economy in many
decisions. They make that choice with full awareness that they will likely
be forgoing a better offer if they took the time to shop around.
From a policy standpoint the question is whether federal legislators
should deny consumers this freedom of choice, and if so, what is the
appropriate alternative. While AHGA strongly encourages consumers to take
the time to shop competitively for all real estate and financing services,
AHGA also believes consumers have the right to make their own choice. In
addition, recent home sellers favor allowing banks to offer real estate
brokerage by a 2 to 1 margin according to a 2001 survey.
The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance (AHGA) is a national
bipartisan advocacy organization representing the nation’s 70 million
homeowners. AHGA believes that policies that encourage and protect home
ownership are in our national best interest. Those policies encourage and
sustain the maintenance of a strong and broad middle class, build a sense
of community and responsibility, and facilitate investment in homes, which
are the largest, most universal savings/equity-building vehicle for most
Americans. AHGA’s positions and more information about the organization
are available at www.AmericanHomeowners.org. The American Homeowners
Foundation’s section of the website also contains free educational
materials to help homeowners and future homeowners buy, sell, remodel, and
finance their |