|
Homeowners ask Obama to Press Congress to Extend “Dough for
Dwellings” Tax Credit
Foreclosure Forbearance and Strategic Defaults are a Growing
Trend in Housing
Promote Telework,
Homeowners Tell Federal Communications Commission
I fall
for colors: “Turn! Turn! Turn!”
Broadband Group Lays out Issues for the Federal
Communications Commission
Homeowners ask Obama to Press Congress to Extend “Dough for
Dwellings” Tax Credit
AHGA says “act now” in letter to President Obama.
Following on recent letters to key Congressional leaders
asking them to pass an extension of the expiring first time
home buyers’ tax credit, the American Homeowners Grassroots
Alliance has asked President Obama to step up and assume a
leadership role in this critical effort. In our letter to
the President, AHGA noted that “your administration’s
ongoing efforts to address the recession and the mortgage
crisis are greatly appreciated by all of us. Many challenges
still remain, but the recession would still be a lot worse
and home values a lot less today were it not for your
efforts.”
Despite those admirable efforts, ominous clouds are still
hanging over the housing market. Home values continue to
decline in many areas. Almost seven million homes will
ultimately be foreclosed on, according to the Amherst
Securities Group. That is the equivalent of almost a year
and a half of typical housing sales. Such a large inventory
is a major barrier to the recovery of home values, and will
continue to drive down home prices. This staggering amount
of nonperforming assets continues to threaten the viability
of many mortgage lenders.
In addition the subprime mortgage crisis has expanded into a
prime mortgage crisis. Homeowners with excellent prior
credit histories are increasingly in trouble. At the
beginning of 2007 only about 2% of fixed rate or adjustable
prime mortgages were in foreclosure or more than 90 days
delinquent. By the end of this past June, 9% were at that
point. Meanwhile the share of the remaining subprime
mortgages that were in foreclosure or more than 90 days
delinquent has grown from 8% to 27% over the same period.
One in eight American homeowners with a mortgage were in
foreclosure or behind on their mortgage payments by the end
of June.
The growth in troubled prime mortgages is no doubt due in
large part to increased unemployment. Many former
creditworthy homeowners will be out of the housing market
for many years to come due both to trashed credit and lack
of cash. Economists are predicting a relatively jobless
recovery in an economy where the jobless rate is approaching
10% and may go higher. There are few factors that are likely
to increase demand for homes over the next several years,
and numerous factors that, left unchecked, are very likely
to further drive down home values.
The current situation would be substantially worse were it
not for the current first time buyers tax credit. An
estimated 350,000 first time buyers will have used it before
it expires on December 1, according to several independent
estimates, and the entry of these new homeowners into the
market has played a significant role in staving off further
declines in home values. These new buyers are also having a
multiplier effect, enabling many existing home sellers to
sell their home and move up the housing food chain. The
expiration of the credit will likely result in another round
of significant drops in home values and a jump in
foreclosures, and a major challenge to our still fragile
economic recovery.
The most helpful step President Obama could take to prevent
a further meltdown in housing values, and a resulting new
wave of foreclosures, is to undertake an immediate major
effort to encourage Congress to extend, increase, and expand
eligibility for the first time home buyers tax credit. A
number of pending Congressional measures would extend the
existing tax credit for another year, and several would also
expand the eligibility and increase the cap on the credit.
The biggest challenge to the extension is the federal tax
revenue loss that would result from various versions of the
credit’s extension, which range as high as $38.5 billion.
The size of the federal deficit is a concern to all of us,
and this is a lot of money. One of the few bright spots on
the economic horizon is the expected repayment of some of
the TARP funds loaned to financial services firms. Since
many of those firms are involved in the mortgage market,
they would benefit from stabilization of home values. For
that reason, it would make sense to earmark those repayments
to cover the revenue losses from the home buyers’ tax
credit’s extension.
In addition to supporting the most robust possible tax
credit extension, AHGA believes that other steps are also
necessary to prevent substantial further declines in home
values. The Administration has made ceaseless efforts to
work with mortgage lenders and mortgage servicers to
encourage them to modify mortgage terms when it is in the
mutual best interest of their stockholders and distressed
homeowners. Sadly, those efforts have born little fruit
despite the massive amounts of taxpayer subsidies already
provided those companies, and the recent additional tax
incentives they are being offered to subsidize mortgage
modification costs.
AHGA’s take is that many of the lenders are ungrateful for
these taxpayer bailouts and are now playing a game of
chicken with the Administration, Congress, American
homeowners, and other taxpayers. They know further drops in
home values will put millions more homeowners on the street.
They’re counting on the Administration and Congress to cave
in and pay off the full amount of those nonperforming
mortgages in order to stop the bleeding. Large bonuses to
financial services executives will surely follow. There is
however, a better solution.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank has
taken stock of this situation and recently announced that he
will seek reconsideration of bankruptcy reform legislation
if lenders and loan originators don’t step up their efforts
to modify mortgages. Since lenders are not willing to take
actions to correct the problem that they caused, it is
important that the President also strongly back Mr. Frank’s
renewed efforts to pass bankruptcy reform legislation to
enable bankruptcy judges to restructure mortgages when it
will help both homeowners and the mortgage lender’s
stockholders.
A remaining challenge is the reform of management practices
in the financial services sector. The Administration also
deserves credit for continuing to prod Congress to pass
financial services reform legislation. House Financial
Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank shared draft
legislation with his colleagues during the last week of
September, and held the first in a series of hearings on
September 30.
The management decisions that lead to the mortgage crisis
reflect the abdication of financial services sector
managers’ fiduciary duty to prudently manage their
stockholders’ assets. Also largely missing is a sense of
duty to help our country in this crisis. We bailed them out,
and offer them subsidies to use that money to restructure
mortgages when it is in their own interest. AHGA admittedly
has no inspired ideas for legislative provisions that could
restore good judgment and a sense of moral character to the
financial services sector, but such provisions are surely
needed.
top
Foreclosure Forbearance and Strategic Defaults are a
Growing Trend in Housing

As lender options narrow, what will happen next?
Several recent phenomena are changing the face of
real estate finance. The first is foreclosure
forbearance – the growing mortgage lender practice
of simply delaying foreclosure on homeowners who are
financially unable to keep up with their mortgage
payments. The second is strategic defaults – the
growing trend of some homeowners who can afford to
keep up with their mortgage payments to simply stop
paying on mortgages that are deeply underwater. Both
of these trends are contributing to a rapid buildup
of nonperforming mortgages that ultimately threatens
the recovery of housing values and the viability of
financial services firms with large mortgage
portfolios.
Foreclosure forbearance appears most common in areas
that have been hard hit by the housing recession and
among homeowners whose homes are deepest under
water. According to a Wall Street Journal study by
LPS Applied Analytics, mortgage companies had not
yet initiated foreclosure on 1.2 million loans that
were at least 90 days in arrears as of July 2009. At
the same time there were also 217,000 mortgages
where the homeowner hadn't made a mortgage payment
in at least a year, yet the lender hadn't initiated
foreclosure.
As the inventory of unsold homes climbs, more
lenders are coming to the realization that putting
too many of the foreclosed homes they own on the
market at the same time will only depress home
values even further. This hurts the value of the
homes in their own inventory. Vacant foreclosed
homes are harder to sell because of lack of ongoing
routine maintenance, like mowing the lawn. Those
homes are also much more subject to vandalism, both
by bitter departing former homeowners and vandals
after the home is vacant. In addition, selling a
home that is deeply underwater requires a large
write off for the lender. This doesn’t look good on
the lender’s books, and there is always the chance
the current homeowner’s fortune may change and they
may be able to resume their mortgage payments.
Eventually something will have to give. The lenders
will have to resolve the issue of nonperforming
assets, either through another round of government
bailouts, restructuring the mortgages, or
foreclosing and selling the homes. Our guess is that
lenders are currently holding their breath for a
bailout, and hoping for a recovery in the housing
market while they do so.
A study titled "Moral and Social Constraints to
Strategic Default on Mortgages" by Guiso, Sapienza
and Zingales looked into the frequency of "strategic
defaults". In a strategic default, the homeowner can
afford the mortgage payments but chooses not to make
them. This occurs in 26 % of existing defaults
according to the study.
An interesting element of the survey results relates
to the morality of strategic defaults. The majority
of respondents (81%) believed that "it is morally
wrong to walk away from a house when one can afford
to pay the monthly mortgage." However, their actual
behavior would be influenced by economic realities.
Only 7% of those who believe it is morally wrong to
walk away from a house when one can afford to pay
the monthly mortgage would walk away from a home
that was $50,000 underwater (i.e. they owed $50,000
more on the mortgage than the home was worth.
However 37% would walk away from a mortgage that was
$200,000 underwater, even though they thought it was
morally wrong to do so.
This data perhaps help explain why there is a
correlation between the frequency of failure of a
restructured mortgage and how deeply underwater the
new mortgage is. If this correlation is valid, the
Administration’s recent decision to raise the
eligibility bar from a 105% loan-to-value ratio to
125% for some refinanced mortgages is going to
result in a higher frequency of subsequent defaults.
It also raises a question of how many underwater
homeowners are going to be interested in
restructuring a mortgage if the restructured
mortgage still leaves them deeply underwater.
The problem is more significant than many realize.
There were 588,000 strategic defaults in 2008,
according to a study by the Oliver Wyman Company.
They accounted for 18% of delinquencies of over two
months duration during the fourth quarter of 2008.
The study concluded that most of strategic
defaulters are financially sophisticated homeowners,
often with very high credit ratings, who have made a
calculated decision that the damage to their credit
is preferable to paying the mortgages.
Another data point that fits in with this new
research is 2008 research showing that mortgages
that have undergone mortgage balance reductions to
bring them more in line with the home’s current
market value are much less likely to fail. The data
collectively suggests that mortgage lenders are
better off, in terms of reducing the risk of
redefaults of restructured loans, if they focus on
reducing the mortgage balance. A homeowner would be
less likely to redefault on a mortgage whose balance
is in line with the homes current value, even if it
carried a higher than market interest rate, than the
same homeowner would be to redefault on a below
market mortgage interest rate on a mortgage
substantially larger than the home’s market value,
even though the payments in these two examples might
be exactly the same.
Many economists are predicting further drops in home
values. With home appreciation unlikely to return
for many years, lenders may be smart to start using
mortgage balance reductions as a tool to reduce
redefaults. This would reduce subsequent
foreclosures, which in turn would help stabilize
prices. Stabilized home prices should in turn also
reduce the number of strategic defaults because they
go up as negative equity increases.
top
Promote Telework, Homeowners Tell Federal
Communications Commission
 |
|
AHGA President
Bruce Hahn (left) thanks
Virginia Governor (and DNC
Chairman) Tim Kaine for supporting
Virginia’s August 3 Telework Day. |
Teleworking tax credit, other incentives will help the
environment, homeowners, and business.
In response to a request for comments from the
Federal Communications Commission, the American
Homeowners Grassroots Alliance (AHGA) on September
22 suggested a variety of new policies to promote
teleworking. “Homeowners are welcoming telework for
many reasons”, AHGA President Bruce Hahn told the
FCC Commissioners: “With the dramatic growth in two
income families, time-starved parents find that
teleworking helps them cope with the many
responsibilities of child-rearing. As commuting
distances and times lengthen due to suburban sprawl,
teleworking also provides a way to recapture
precious hours lost to traffic jams. Surveys
consistently show that telecommuting programs are
among the most popular employee benefits. A recent
survey of members of the American Institute of
Architects revealed that home offices are the most
popular special function room of new home buyers for
the third year in a row.”
According to IDC, a national research firm, there
are now between 34.3 million and 36.6 million home
office households in the United States. At least 18
million are home-based businesses, according to U.S.
Census figures. They include millions of
internet-centric service businesses such as website
designers, consultants, real estate agents, eBay
Power Sellers and other Internet auction-based
merchants who derive all or most of their income
from Internet commerce. The rest are telecommuting
employees of businesses of all sizes or employees of
the federal, state or local governments.
In September Virginia Governor Tim Kaine announced
that 2,286 federal and private sector employees as
well as 1,765 state employees participated in
Telework Day in Virginia. Those teleworkers saved
approximately $113,000, avoided driving 140,000
miles and removed 75.89 tons of pollutants from the
air through participation in Telework Day on August
3, 2009. If all eligible employees teleworked one
day per week for a year, teleworkers in the
Commonwealth would collectively avoid driving 602
million miles, remove 360,800 tons of pollutants
from the air, and save $807 million in commuting
costs. Over the course of a year this would equal a
$1,822 annual raise for every teleworker in
Virginia, and save 46 hours a year in commuting. A
survey of Virginia's teleworkers also showed that 69
percent felt they accomplished more than a typical
day at the office and 91 percent said that they
would be more likely to telework again as a result
of their experience.
Home-based technology-centric businesses (we call
them telehome businesses) benefit society in
many ways. Telehome business owners and
telecommuters are helping to reduce rush hour
traffic jams and defer the need for state and
federal transportation infrastructure expansion and
maintenance investments. No vehicle gets better
mileage during rush hour than one that remains in
the driveway. A study by TIAX LLC determined that a
full time telecommuter who lives 22 miles from her
office would save 320 gallons of gasoline and reduce
CO2 emissions by 4.5 to 6 tons per year. The shift
to teleworking is thus helping reduce environmental
pollution and global warming.
To encourage faster growth in telework, AHGA made
the following policy recommendations:
a. Provide federal and state tax credits to
encourage teleworking. A home office requires a
substantial expenditure of money for hardware,
software and broadband access by a home-based
business owner, a telecommuter and/or the
telecommuter’s employer. The recent $4,000 Cash
for Clunkers program shows tax credits can be a
very effective stimulus, and the current $8,000
first time home buyers tax credit is helping to
pull the housing industry out of a steep
decline. If we can provide Cash for Clunkers and
dough for dwellings, why not a similar effort to
encourage teleworking? The federal government
currently provides a $2,000 federal tax credit
for hybrid vehicles purchases. An important
justification for the tax credit is that hybrid
vehicles greatly reduce air pollution,
especially that caused by commuters and rush
hour traffic jams. Because it would achieve an
even better outcome (no vehicular air pollution
from cars in the driveway and less air pollution
because of fewer/shorter traffic jams), AHGA
recommends a similar $2,000 tax credit for
technology expenses used in teleworking
(hardware, software, broadband access, cell
phones, etc). Whoever paid for the
products/services (telehome business owner,
telecommuter, and/or his/her employer), would be
eligible for the tax credits.
b. To stimulate telehome businesses, help the
environment, and reduce state and local
transportation infrastructure costs, Congress
should prohibit state sales taxes on Internet
transactions. State and local governments exempt
consumers from sales taxes for a variety of
economic activities anyway (sales of
prescription drugs and tax holidays on back to
school expenses, etc.). An Internet commerce
sales tax exemption is equally deserving. It
would encourage Internet commerce, substantially
reducing automotive pollution since the products
will be delivered by the US postal carriers, and
FedEx/UPS trucks that go up and down their
streets anyway. It would reduce state and local
government costs of maintaining and expanding
transportation infrastructure. Such a policy is
strongly supported by voters. Last year, Parade
Magazine asked its readers “Should You Pay Sales
Tax on Internet Shopping?” Based on 3,125
responses, 85% opposed taxing Internet sales.
c. Reform depreciation laws affecting technology
products. Technology products (computers,
peripherals cell phones, etc.) become outdated
very quickly. To encourage employers/telehome
businesses to maintain technological
competitiveness, their depreciable lifespan
should be reduced to 2 years. Recordkeeping
should also be simplified and liberalized for
home offices, and limited personal use of
computers, Internet access services, cell
phones, etc., should be exempt from taxable
liability.
d. Since broadband access is essential to
teleworking, the $7 billion+ in stimulus funds
allocated for expanding service to the unserved
and underserved should be focused on the
unserved. Further, it should focus on those
unserved areas which will not soon be served by
other private/public sector broadband
deployments already in process or planning over
the next few years. This will maximize the
number of additional homes that can receive
broadband as a result of the effort.
e. Adoption rates are important. Not all
unserved rural communities are alike. Some
remain essentially farming communities with
shrinking populations of older residents, mostly
farmers. Others are growing, have more new,
younger, and technologically oriented residents
whose demographics more closely reflect suburban
populations. Such communities with a high
percentage of “ruburbian” residents (rural
residents with urban/suburban demographic
characteristics) exist across the country and
are good candidates for broadband deployment
from an ROI standpoint.
AHGA
also recommended several tax incentives to encourage
businesses to invest in telecommuting programs and
help broadband service providers both strengthen
their networks and expand the availability of
broadband services in unserved areas. The complete
text of the American Homeowners Grassroots
Alliance’s FCC submission is
here.
top
I fall
for colors: “Turn! Turn! Turn!”
A tribute to the fall colors by
Blue Grass, Virginia author Curtis Seltzer.
The best
show this side of the Northern Lights started this week in
our back pasture on the north-facing bank of Key Run, a
bratty little stream that feeds the Potomac River.
A young sugar maple started turning
orange and green-gold. Color shows first on the outer edges
of the outer leaves, then the inner part of the outer
leaves, then the leaves closest to the trunk.
As the days shorten, these
solar-powered sugar factories flame up. Eventually, leaves
“fall,” a word that better describes this season than the
fancy-pants term, “autumn.”
Higher up on Snowy Mountain, the
deciduous trees -- the oaks, maples, cherry and ash -- still
hug their greenery tight as bathrobes. But they, too, will
strip for winter, down to their bare bark.
A funny kind of Cinderella ethic is at
work out here. The most raggedy, twisted and worthless tree
may pretty up better than the best formed, flawless and most
valuable. Whose heart is so hard that it does not melt at a
fairy godmother working her magic? Not even mine.
When I was a kid, I had the idea that
trees turned red and purple because they were holding their
breath, which is how my toddler cousin looked when she was
told no…and held her breath. I should mention that I had
trouble with the analogy section on the SAT.
You get a different sense of fall when
you’re inside a turning woods. You’re no longer looking at a
picture; you’re now part of it. It dances with you. It
whispers in your ear. Close your eyes and you hear leaves
falling, then landing. Keeping your eyes shut is cooler than
watching leaves gasp for chlorophyll, but it does make you
dizzy.
Our fall color splash is considered a
free show, though Americans spend about $1 billion riding
around and gawking at these plants like a bunch of tourists.
Everyone feels entitled to a good,
long look at no charge. I am unaware of anyone selling
tickets to passing strangers for taking in the beauty of
their property.
However, getting inside wooded land at
the top of the fall turn is worth paying for.
Many years ago, our county considered
an ordinance that could have, among other things, required a
vegetative screen in front of new poultry houses along
public roads. I was alone in talking up the importance of
protecting our “viewsheds.”
A prominent local farmer replied at
one meeting that he knew about a watershed and a pig shed,
but a viewshed was a new one on him. Everyone guffawed and
slapped a thigh, including me.
He understood protecting the view
from his property, but the idea of protecting the view
of his property for someone else rubbed his sense of
rights the wrong way. He didn’t want to spend his money for
that. No one -- me, too -- likes to be told to pay for
something that benefits others.
Since then, many of the fights we’ve
had amongst ourselves have been about viewsheds--how a
landowner can change the look of his property, and what
property rights and public rights others might have in
limiting his freedom to look the way he wants. These
questions are not easily answered. No one laughs viewsheds
out of our conversations anymore. Thigh-slapping is out;
head-scratching is in.
For six years, we have argued over a
proposal to put a 19-turbine windfarm on the top of a high
ridge on our border with West Virginia. Neighbors have
opposed the project, because they fear -- and I think
rightly so -- that their property will be devalued by the
nearby presence of 400-foot-tall windmills. Some think that
tourists will no longer come to see our natural beauty;
others think tourists will come to watch the windmills turn.
(After all, they come to see the leaves turn, don’t they?)
Arguments were also heard about
killing bats and birds, and adding sediment to streams. But
I think the fight was mainly over what people, other than
the land-owning developer, wanted to see and not see on
his land. I could, of course, be wrong, which I often am
when it comes to reading between unwritten lines.
In a big-picture sense -- a
forest-not-the-trees sense -- our fight over a handful of
wind turbines is about what sustainable development means in
our little patch of countryside.
I favored a compromise that would go
ahead with the windfarm if the turbines were sited lower on
the mountain and scaled down a bit to protect current views.
I thought these modifications would make the project more
acceptable, but at the cost of some efficiency. Every
utility power plant in the country sacrifices efficiency to
protect the public’s air, water and land from pollutants.
Why should windfarms be different?
Neither side wanted to find middle
ground, or consider what sustainable development might mean
when push came to shove. A badly conceived project met a
badly thought-out opposition. This seems to be one of those
unfortunate situations where everyone loses more than anyone
gains.
We are now in one season of “Turn!
Turn! Turn!” And we anticipate a year-round turning of a
different sort.
Ecclesiastes, who was nice enough to
write lyrics for Pete Seeger and the Byrds, figured that
every zig was followed by a zag, back and forth, a time to
do this and then a time to do that, its opposite.
Sustainable development argues that
you need to zig and zag at the same time. Ecclesiastes was
not down with blending contradictory actions. If you’ve ever
tried it, you know it can be tricky.
On the other hand, the luxury of
swinging back and forth like a demented pendulum may no
longer be ours to enjoy.
And so, maybe all of us can learn
something from being in the middle of turnings of both
types.
Curtis Seltzer is a land consultant
who works with buyers and helps sellers develop marketing
plans. He is author of How To Be a DIRT-SMART Buyer of
Country Property available at
www.curtis-seltzer.com,
where his weekly columns are posted. He also writes weekly
for
www.LandThink.com.
top
Broadband Group Lays out Issues for the Federal
Communications Commission
American Homeowners and 160 other
organizations participated in the effort.
Over 160 organizations, including the American
Homeowners Grassroots alliance, participated in efforts
of the US Broadband Coalition to provide constructive
suggestions to the FCC to help it develop a
comprehensive national broadband strategy. The
coalition’s membership was very diverse, including
consumer groups unions, trade associations and
corporations from many segments of the technology
sector. The 18 month effort culminated in a report which
was presented to the FCC on September 24.
At the time we began this effort in early 2008, very few
groups were calling for a national broadband strategy.
Many of the current members of the Coalition were not
convinced that such a strategy was necessary, and those
that were did not necessarily agree on its basic
elements. Agreement on the overall framework for a
national broadband strategy, much less specific policy
options, seemed a long way off.
It was not until we began work on a
“Call to Action for a National Broadband Strategy” that our
process began to gel. We discovered that the organizations
in the Coalition at the time shared many goals, at least in
a general sense, and we were able to develop a framework for
a national broadband strategy that included federal support
for the development, adoption, and use of broadband
infrastructure. We also formed six internal working groups
to address a large number of complex issues and further
develop our work as a Coalition.
Two months after we issued our Call to
Action, Congress and President Obama enacted the Stimulus
Act, providing for federal support of the development,
adoption, and use of broadband infrastructure and requiring
the Federal Communications Commission to develop a National
Broadband Plan by February 17, 2010. Our work gained added
relevance.
For the last nine months, our issue groups have worked hard
to identify key policy issues and priorities, and to develop
as much agreement on them as possible. The American
Homeowners Grassroots Alliance participated in several of
the groups..We have reached consensus on many of the
principles, values, and ultimate goals that are likely to
underlie the National Broadband Plan. As discussed in our
report, we have also generated a wealth of new ideas, many
of them worthy of serious consideration and further
discussion. We have not, however, reached consensus on
specific policies. That is not surprising, given the
magnitude of the challenge we undertook and the many
different perspectives and interests represented by our
group.
In the end, the main value of our effort may lie in what it
has confirmed about the benefits of good-faith and
constructive engagement. Individuals representing groups
that have historically been at odds have had an opportunity
to exchange ideas that often get lost in typical debates
about broadband policy, to participate in serious
discussions with a wide range of individuals whom they
seldom get to know well, and to obtain a better
understanding of the many sides of the important
broadband-related issues confronting our nation. In
particular, we have made considerable progress in
understanding how and why we disagree. On at least some
issues, this could lead to even more progress in the future.
Many policy challenges on the road to universal broadband
availability lie ahead. Some of differences have been
narrowed because of the coalition’s efforts. The challenges
will no doubt be more easily resolved, and resolved sooner
as a result of the US Broadband Coalition’s efforts. For a
copy of the complete report go to
www.bb4us.net
top
|

Please take the time to contact your legislators and
express your views on pending policy issues covered in
this month’s Home Base. It's easy - you can reach
your legislators by email in a couple of mouse
clicks, and you can use the content in Home Base and
elsewhere on our website to help you develop your
message.
To look up the phone number, email, and/or
postal address of your U.S. Representative or your
two U.S. Senators, (or your state representative or
state senator)
click here. You can also look up which
legislators represent your zip
code if you don’t recall their names.
A personal meeting is a particularly effective way
to get their attention and reinforce your message.
Many legislators are also happy to meet personally
with their constituents when they are back home on
weekends or when Congress is not in session. The
House and Senate are in recess until September 8.
Please consider also requesting a follow up
face-to-face meeting in their home state or home
district offices near you when you contact their
Washington DC offices on policy issues.
Is there a policy issue that is particularly
important to you which significantly impacts
homeowners or home ownership? Any member may propose
a position on a policy issue, so please check the
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance's 2009
Issue Guide to see whether it’s already on our
list. If it isn't on the list, we invite you to send
us an email and tell us why you think the American
Homeowners Grassroots Alliance should take a
position and work on it.
|