November 2007

Home

Home Base
A publication of the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance and the American Homeowners Foundation   www.americanhomeowners.org

ahf ahga

November  2007      


In this issue of Home Base:

Home Prices and Sales Continue to Drop

Congressional Chairmen Propose Major Tax Law Overhauls

Advances Continue in Home Energy Efficiency

Congress Passes Internet Tax Moratorium

10 Tips for Healthier Home Air This Winter

The Complaint Department is Open

Healthcare Proposals Take One Step Forward, One Back

Homeowners Detail Recommendations to Encourage Teleworking


Home Prices and Sales Continue to Drop

The trend is affecting other sectors as well.

September home sales dropped 19% from September of 2006, according to the National Association of Realtors. Nationwide the inventory of unsold homes is the highest in nearly twenty years. While there are a few locations where home prices are actually increasing, in most areas they continue to drop, in some cases dramatically. Home prices fell 0.6% in July and declined 4.5% in the past year in 10 major cities, the sharpest decline in 16 years, according to the latest Case-Shiller home price index.

Some 2 - 2.5 million adjustable-rate mortgages totaling about $600 billion will adjust from low initial interest rates to higher interest rates in 2007 and 2008. In many cases homeowners can’t afford monthly mortgage payment increases of as much as 30%. The problem is aggravated because many of those homeowners made only a small down payment when they purchased the home. Due to declining home values many now owe more than they can sell their homes for, and unless they have enough savings to make up the difference they’re trapped. As a result, if the decline in home values continues it will contribute to an estimated two million subprime-mortgage foreclosures by 2009, according to an October 26 report from Congress’s Joint Economic Committee. Property tax revenue will decline $917 million because of the foreclosures, and homeowners will lose $71 billion in home equity as a result.

The continuing bad news is affecting homeowners’ attitudes as well as spending in other areas. A September survey found that homeowners have become more concerned about falling home prices in recent months, according to Richard Curtin, director of the Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers. Substantial increases in food and energy costs are beginning to drag down consumer spending in other areas, according to Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist with MFR Inc., another research organization.

One-third of households with incomes below $50,000 said that higher prices had already devastated their family’s budget, and half of these families expected prices to increase faster than their incomes during the year ahead, reducing their living standards even more,” Mr. Curtin noted. According to a September survey by the Conference Board consumer confidence is at its lowest point in nearly two years.

In another survey conducted in September by TNS, the problems in the housing sector are going to result in spending cuts elsewhere. Many consumers (1/3) expect to cut discretionary spending because of the direct or indirect impact of subprime mortgage crisis. Spending reductions are likely in home improvement and furniture, vacation travel, entertainment, and technology purchases.

Consumers believe many players have contributed to the mortgage sector crisis. They include subprime mortgage lenders (70% of consumers think they caused some or all of it), real estate brokers/agents (60%), the subprime mortgage borrowers themselves (58%), and investors (57%).

A key question is whether the growing plethora of Congressional and Administration proposals intended to address the downward spiral of home values will blunt the trend. The most recent round of proposals includes legislation approved by the House of Representatives that would exempt loan forgiveness from federal taxes. It would offset the loss in federal tax revenue by limiting a tax benefit on the sale of second homes, which could negatively impact that segment of the housing market. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson recently pressured loan servicers to modify their terms with borrowers where practical to help save more homeowners from foreclosure. Another Congressional bill would codify the Secretary’s request, enable judges to require that mortgage lenders modify terms for homeowners in bankruptcy proceedings. This would encourage lenders and investors to use a little more prudence in approving mortgage loans in the future. Other pending measures to help homeowners caught in the crunch were summarized in the October issue of Home Base.

 A growing number of forecasters are estimating that home prices are unlikely to start rising in most of the country before 2009 or 2010. Even if true this decade will probably end up looking fairly typical for home appreciation. “Historically home appreciation is fairly modest – typically 2-3% a year”, according to Bruce Hahn, President of the American Homeowners Foundation and the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance. “Over the long term home ownership is an outstanding investment. If you owned a home in 2000, it will likely be worth 30-40% more in 2010 than it was worth a decade earlier. As a highly leveraged investment that you can live in, that’s an excellent return when you factor in the tax benefits. If the pending proposals can help many of the first time buyers and other innocents who were burned by the unsound lending practices in the early part of this decade, homeowners and the economy should emerge relatively unscathed at the decade’s conclusion.”

top


Congressional Chairmen Propose Major Tax Law Overhauls

Two key House Legislators propose measures that will impact homeowners.

House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman John Dingell is developing legislation that would phase out mortgage interest deductions for houses larger than 3,000 square feet. Homes larger than 4,200 square feet would not be eligible for any mortgage interest deduction. The proposal is gaining support from environmental groups, threatening to reignite the divisiveness between homeowners and environmentalists that first surfaced when the latter supported environmental takings without compensation for monetary losses by homeowners who lost their right to build homes on their lots. Environmental groups supporting the limiting of the mortgage interest deduction include the Friends of the Earth, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the Carbon Tax Center.

Although the goal of the proposal – to reduce home energy consumption – is a worthy one, AHGA believes there are far better approaches to this challenge. AHGA’s approach has been to support incentives to build more energy efficient homes and to improve the energy efficiency of existing homes, and to encourage teleworking as a means of reducing automotive pollution and pressures on our transportation infrastructure.

House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel has proposed sweeping legislation that would repeal the alternative minimum tax, which is impacting growing numbers of homeowners. It would shift an estimated $1 trillion in taxes on about 91 million taxpayers to high income taxpayers over a 10 year period. It would impose 4% surtax on married couples with adjusted gross incomes of $200,000+ and 4.4% surtax on couples with more than $500,000 in income.

It is very likely that the vast majority of homeowners would benefit from the change, especially as the number impacted by the alternative minimum tax continues to grow at an alarming rate. “Our main concern is that homeowners in many areas of expensive homes aren’t hurt by the measure”, said AHGA President Bruce Hahn. In some major cities the median home price is now above $500,000, and this doesn’t buy you a fancy home. As a result a homeowner with a $200,000 income in those areas does not lead a “wealthy” lifestyle by any reasonable standard. AHGA believes housing costs should be taken into account, with a cost of housing factor built in to increase the $200,000 surtax threshold in expensive areas.

AHGA has encouraged Chairman Rangel to add tax incentives to encourage teleworking and more energy efficient homes to his omnibus measure. This might necessitate a slight increase in the proposed 4.4% surtax on couples with incomes greater than $500,000. This would not be too onerous a tax increase on the rich, since much of their income is taxed at a fairly low rate, and they would still be taxed at far lower rates than they were before Congress started cutting taxes on the wealthy back in the 1980s.

Consideration of this measure is unlikely until next year. In the interim Congress is likely to enact a temporary patch to the alternative minimum tax in order to mitigate its impact on lower income taxpayers and prevent it from impacting even more moderate income taxpayers through ”bracket creep”.

top


Advances Continue in Home Energy Efficiency

Home energy efficiency is improving rapidly, thanks to a number of factors.

Home energy efficiency is improving rapidly, thanks to the convergence of numerous factors. One of the most obvious factors is skyrocketing energy costs. Heating-oil futures rose to $2.36 a gallon in October, an increase of more than 40% since the beginning of the year. The eight million homes that use heating oil to run their furnaces each winter are looking at an expensive winter - $1,785, up $319 from last winter, or 22%.even if it turns out to be relatively mild. The costs of most other fuels are also expected to rise this winter, though not as much as home heating oil. Natural gas heating costs will rise about $78, or 9.5%. Electric heat cost about $32, or 4% more, this winter. Propane users will spend about $1,570 this winter, an increase of $221, or 16%. The average homeowner will pay about $88 more to heat their home this winter, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

Actual energy costs and cost increases will depend on a number of factors, including the size and energy efficiency of homes and their HVAC systems, thermostat settings, local energy prices, and local weather conditions. The National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) has predicted that winter temperatures will probably be a little warmer than average. However, given the government’s long range weather forecasting track record, we could face a long cold winter. Geopolitical conditions, which are heading in the wrong direction in several oil producing countries, could cause an energy crisis that could drive up energy costs astronomically.

Many homeowners who have paid attention to the growing costs of energy in the home have taken steps to reduce those costs. Federal and state tax incentives and/or subsidies have helped accelerate the process. Congress passed the Energy Policy Act in 2005. The Act provides a tax credit to consumers making specific energy-efficient upgrades to their homes. These upgrades include everything from installing more insulation to weatherproofing your doors and windows and investing in approved energy-efficient appliances.

The legislation’s tax credit will expire on December 31 this year unless extended. In addition to the aforementioned improvements, you can also get federal tax credits in the following amounts for home energy efficiency improvements that are in place by the end of this year, according to the Alliance to Save Energy:

1. Furnace and boiler: credit up to $150
Homeowners are entitled to a rebate of up to $150 of the purchase price, including the cost of installation. To qualify, the furnace must meet exacting efficiency requirements.

2. Exterior windows, skylights and storm windows: credit up to $200.
Homeowners are entitled to 10% of total cost, not to exceed $200. All windows must meet tithe standards of the 2001 or 2004 International Energy Conservation Code and must be expected to last at least five years.

3. Central air conditioner, heat pump or water heater: credit up to $300
Homeowners are entitled to up to $300 of purchase price. This includes the cost of installation. All products must meet stringent energy-efficiency standards.

4. Insulation, exterior doors: credit up to $500
Homeowners are entitled to 10% of the cost of the product up to $500, not including installation. Qualified improvements include storm doors, seals and weather-stripping designed to limit air infiltration. Insulation and doors are required to meet the 2001 or 2004 International Energy Conservation Code standards for your region and must be expected to last for at least five years.

5. Pigmented roofs: credit up to $500
Homeowners are entitled to 10% of the cost of the product up to $500, not including installation. Pigmented roofs must be expected to last at least five years and must meet Energy Star requirements.

Consumer education is playing a big role in accelerating home energy efficiency. Much of it comes from word of mouth and Internet research. Federal, state, and local governments, nonprofits, building industry product manufacturers, real estate writers, and environmental organizations are also helping homeowners understand both the economic benefits of home energy efficiency and the importance of reducing global warming.

Much of that education is targeted at the nation’s youth and young adults. These future homeowners will decide the energy efficiency of future American Homes. For example the U.S. Department of Energy sponsored the third Solar Decathlon in October (go to www.solardecathalon.org for more information). Held on the mall of the Smithsonian Museum, and framed by the U.S. Capitol and the Washington Monuments at either end, twenty colleges from around the world exhibited their energy efficient model homes in a contest to encourage the development of new home energy efficiency technologies. This year the winning team came from the Technische Universitat Darmstadt, in Germany.

Lines to get in to the model homes were long throughout the 5 day program, which also featured free seminars provided by green building experts. “ I learned a lot about the benefits of energy efficient homes” said Brian Hahn, a high school junior who attended the exhibition with his parents. “I’ll definitely be up for that kind of home when I get ready to buy my first home”.

Engineering major Danille Lockman explains energy efficiency technologies in the University of Maryland’s entry to high school student Brian Hahn

According to McGraw-Hill Construction’s “The Green Homeowner SmartMarket(TM) Report” coauthored by the National Association of Home Builders, the demand for “green” homes and home remodeling products is projected to increase from $2 billion to $20 billion in the next five years. Green products are found increasingly in more new homes, and homeowners are using green products in 40% of their remodeling projects. Homeowners buy green homes to reduce energy and other home operating costs and out of concern about the health of their families, and they generally recommend those improvements to their friends.

Some states are also mandating home energy improvements. The California Public Utilities Commission California adopted a target that all homes built after 2020 should produce at least as much energy as they consume. Home builders would achieve this ambitious goal through such measures as advanced insulation and solar power systems. All new commercial buildings would have to meet the zero-net-energy target by 2030.

top


Congress Passes Internet Tax Moratorium

A Halloween Treat for American Homeowners!

The day before Halloween the U.S. House of Representatives accepted the Senate version of the Internet tax moratorium bill by a vote of 405-2. The original House version of the bill would ban Internet access taxes for the next four years, but the Senate wanted to make it seven years. In its vote the House agreed and immediately sent the bill to President Bush, who signed the bill in time Halloween afternoon.

The Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA), enacted in 1998, prevented states and localities from imposing taxes on Internet service. However, the original bill was temporary and the law was renewed in 2001 and 2004. Although the President may not sign the bill before the current version expires on Nov. 1, 2007, states will probably not have enough time to pass any new taxes before he does sign it.

The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance, a member of the coalition pushing for the extension, had testified in favor of the moratorium and was delighted with the outcome. “This is great news for American consumers!” said AHGA President Bruce Hahn. “The next logical step is to put to rest another effort by state government organizations to make Internet vendors provide free sales tax collection services on Internet sales outside of their home state. Many of them are American homeowners who are holding their yard sale on eBay. What's needed next is a moratorium on all Internet sales taxes, so we can help protect the environment by letting the mail carrier deliver products to our door rather than polluting the atmosphere in another drive to the mall.”

AHGA made those suggestions in its October 3 House testimony, and also suggested in its testimony that Congress take steps to encourage the use of the Internet to expand teleworking, which will also help reduce automotive pollution.

top


10 Tips for Healthier Home Air This Winter

Good suggestions from RISMEDIA, EPA and SafeHome Filters.

RISMEDIA, Oct. 24, 2007-Closing up a home for winter weather can make allergies and asthma worse, due to sealing in aggravating indoor air pollutants. Indoor air pollution poses a greater health risk than air pollution found outdoors. Dangerous gases such as formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) come from items like furniture, carpet and building materials.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently ranked indoor air quality among the top five greatest threats to public health. Based on recommendations from the EPA, SafeHome Filters has developed a list of tips for a healthier home.

1. Store pesticides, paints, glues, and other chemicals outside the home.
2. Make sure the home is well ventilated when painting or using cleaning agents.
3. Use high quality chemical and allergen filters in your heating and air conditioning system.
4. When pollen, dust and pollutants such as ozone are present outdoors, keep your home sealed and use your air system to filter air in your home.
5. A solution of equal parts vinegar and water is safer and, in many cases, more effective than common cleaning agents.
6. Don’t smoke! If you must, smoke only outside and away from windows; change clothes before interacting with children or your spouse.
7. Burn unscented soy candles as an alternative to scented paraffin candles.
8. Choose wool carpet over carpet made of synthetic material. The natural fibers in wool carpeting give off significantly less gas than synthetic fibers.
9. Use only natural or zero VOC paint inside the home. Paints and finishes can release VOC emissions for years after application.
10. Choose furniture and cabinetry made from wood, not composite wood materials such as particle board. Formaldehyde is commonly used as an adhesive in composite wood, and is a known carcinogen.

top


The Complaint Department is Open

The Justice Department encourages the reporting of anticompetitive conduct in the real estate brokerage industry.

To make the reporting easier the Department of Justice has created a new website - www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/real_estate/index.htm , which also explains the different real estate business models and educates consumers and policymakers about the potential benefits that new types of real estate brokerage services competitors can bring to consumers of and the barriers that inhibit the proliferation of new business models.

Among the new real estate business models are real estate brokers that rebate part of their commissions to home buyers and real estate brokers that will put a home for sale on the local multiple listing service. Traditional full commission real estate brokers, who typically charge 5-6% commissions to sellers and don’t offer rebates to buyers, have succeeded in outlawing these business models in some states, on the grounds that they are doing it only to protect consumers and not to perpetuate their high commissions.

The website includes maps identifying states with real estate laws that can inhibit competition, a calculator to help consumers tally their potential savings when brokers pursuing new business models compete for their business, and links to additional government resources.

“Buying or selling a home is the largest financial transaction most Americans will ever undertake,” according to Thomas O. Barnett, assistant attorney general in charge of the Department’s Antitrust Division. “This website will help consumers and policymakers understand the benefits of increased competition among real estate agents.” AHGA agrees, and salutes DoJ for creating this important consumer service. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission also created a web site - http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/real_estate/index.htm. - focusing on competition in the real estate industry. This site also provides valuable information to American Homeowners.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has whined about DoJ’s new website. NAR, which is involved in an ongoing Justice Department antitrust lawsuit over its restrictive policies for Internet listing displays and property information sharing, said that DoJ’s real estate competition website “uses the website as a promotion for unbundled and discount services." However, the consumer section of NAR’s website does not appear to describe the various business model alternatives available to consumers (in areas where their members haven’t outlawed them). For that reason it’s hard to understand why NAR should complain about DoJ’s effort to fill in the void.

top


Healthcare Proposals Take One Step Forward, One Step Back

Congress moved a step closer to passing legislation to reduce health care costs, but legislation to extend medical insurance to more children failed to gain veto-proof support.

Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and Congressman Mike Rogers introduced legislation in October that will bring health information technology to all Americans. The legislation has bipartisan support and is expected to improve medical outcomes while reducing U.S. medical costs by $81 billion over 15 years, according to estimates by the RAND Institute.

The national savings come from the development of uniform national standards for electronic health records (EHRs), to replace the current inefficient hand written record system. Few medical practitioners currently have a complete medical record for their patients that includes their complete medical history, a full listing of illnesses, laboratory tests, treatments, drugs administered, and allergies. Access to that complete information by authorized doctors, nurses, and other specialists will improve medical outcomes and help reduce duplicative and unnecessary procedures. This is an important benefit for cash-strapped homeowners, who are being forced to carry an increasing share of medical and medical insurance costs that have been rising far faster than inflation for decades.

The legislation sets a date for establishing data interoperability standards, provides grants and loans to providers, empowers public-private partnerships, and codifies aspects of the Health IT effort, thus helping to realize life-saving -- and cost-saving -- advances of modern technology. The House legislation largely mirrors a Senate-passed bill sponsored by Senators Kennedy and Enzi.

To move the concept closer to reality the Department of Health and Human Services in October announced a five-year demonstration project that will encourage up to 1,200 small to medium-sized physician practices to adopt electronic health records (EHRs). In many cases those doctors keep only hand written records. The demonstration project is designed to prove that streamlining health care management with electronic health records will reduce medical errors and improve quality of care for 3.6 million Americans.

“By linking higher payment to use of EHRs to meet quality measures, we will encourage adoption of health information technology at the community level, where 60 percent of patients receive care,” HHS Secretary Leavitt said. “We also anticipate that EHRs will produce significant savings for Medicare over time by improving quality of care. This is another step in our ongoing effort to become a smart purchaser of health care – paying for better, rather than simply paying for more.”

While the outlook for the adoption of cost saving information technology that will save money and improve treatment quality looks outstanding, another major measure may have died in the U.S. House of Representatives in October. Earlier it had passed the Children’s Health Insurance Reauthorization Act of 2007 (CHIP), which would provide affordable health coverage for nearly 4 million more children not covered by current funding levels. The expanded coverage would be funded by increasing federal cigarette taxes by 61 cents a pack. Indirect private and government cost savings would result from both earlier and better treatment of children not currently covered by health insurance and by a reduction in cigarette smokers as a result of higher cigarette prices. The bill passed by wide, bipartisan margins in both chambers and offered lawmakers rare common ground on an issue that affects the lives of millions of children.

However President Bush vetoed the bill on the grounds of high costs and several other factors. While the House of Representatives came up a few votes short of enough votes to override the veto, House Democratic leaders immediately began making changes to the legislation which they hoped would either be acceptable to the President or attract enough additional Republican supporters to override another veto if necessary.

Unfortunately the House Democratic leaders executed very poorly on that strategy, according to many Democratic and Republican observers. They failed to establish a dialogue with potential moderate Republican supporters to establish a mutual agreement on the kinds of changes that would be needed to gain their support. And they announced a vote on the redrafted bill, which had not been circulated, only a day before the vote was to take place. Many House Democrats and Republicans urged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to defer the vote to the following week. Many California legislators had already left for home because of the forest fire crisis that was sweeping California, and the extra time would also give potential Republican supporters time to read and understand the changes. Unfortunately Speaker Pelosi was unwilling to wait, and the outcome was even less Republican support for legislation that contained concessions to the President and to Republican legislators.

Many House members believe the revised CHIP bill would have passed by a veto-proof margin had Speaker Pelosi opted to work with moderate Republicans and/or at least given them time to review the measure. At this point the air between the House Democratic leadership and moderate House Republicans is poisoned, and it is as yet unclear whether the process to pass the CHIP bill can be resurrected. AHGA believes that this political stand-off is truly unfortunate. While Democratic leaders can justifiably point to similar past practices by the Republican leadership when they were in charge, the continuation of the practice comes at the expense of all Americans. “At some point this type of partisan warfare has to stop,” said AHGA President Bruce Hahn. “Congressional leaders must recognize that they owe a duty to the American people and stop using the excuse that the other side is just as bad as justification for scoring partisan points over passing legislation that would improve the lives of millions of Americans.”

top


Homeowners Detail Recommendations to Encourage Teleworking

Want to reduce pollution and traffic jams? Become a "telenvironmentalist" and work from home, AHGA tells Congressional panel.

In testimony submitted to the House Small Business Committee, the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance (AHGA) suggested ways to simultaneously help improve the environment and the lifestyles of homeowners. The Committee was holding a hearing on the extension of the Internet Tax Moratorium (see story above). AHGA suggested that extending the Internet Tax Moratorium will encourage more teleworking, which in turn helps reduce automotive pollution and reduces pressure to expand our transportation infrastructure.

For that reason Congress should look for additional legislative solutions to encourage even more teleworking. In its testimony AHGA pointed out the many benefits to society that result from teleworking, whether the homeowner is operating a small business from home or telecommuting to work:

1. Because they do not drive to work these homeowners are helping to reduce rush hour traffic jams and defer the needs for transportation infrastructure investments, both for expansion and maintenance. The shift to home-based teleworking is helping reduce environmental pollution and global warming. A recent study by TIAX LLC determined that a full time telecommuter who lives 22 miles from their company’s office would save 320 gallons of gasoline and reduce CO2 emissions by 4.5 to 6 tons per year. At $3.00 per gallon gasoline prices they would also save homeowners about $1,000 in cash, not including savings in automobile maintenance costs and depreciation resulting from the extra 10,000+ miles they run up annually commuting in the vehicle.

2. Similar benefits result when smart homeowners shop online. A click of the mouse uses a lot less gas than a trip to the mall, and the mail carrier and FedEx/UPS trucks delivering the goods will be coming down your block anyway. Both online shopping and teleworking also save a lot of time, a precious commodity for all of us in our society where the long working hours (Americans work more hours than any other society), leaves too little time for personal relationships and other interests.

3. Since home based business owners and telecommuters are heavy broadband consumers, they provide a revenue base that facilitates broadband expansion to rural areas and underserved markets. New Internet access taxes and multiple and discriminatory taxes on Internet commerce raise the cost of broadband service, thus discouraging the deployment of broadband access that is a prerequisite in most circumstances for most teleworkers and home-based businesses.

4. There are also substantial societal benefits of teleworking. A recent survey by the Kenexa Research Institute found that workers who telecommute, either from home or another remote location, report the highest levels of satisfaction with and loyalty to their company. More of the home-based workers surveyed (73%) were satisfied with their company as a place to work, compared with 64% of office workers, according to the June, 2007 survey of 10,000 U.S. workers.

5. Among future broadband services are a new generation of medical devices that will require broadband access. Wearable 24/7 broadband connected medical monitoring devices now under development will enable many of the several million chronically ill homeowners to remain in their homes rather than being institutionalized in medical facilities. This will save individual homeowners and Medicaid/Medicare/federal/state governments a lot of money. Any tax on the Internet or Internet Commerce could discourage use of this new technology in healthcare applications, reducing the potential cost savings and ultimately increasing health care costs for all of us.

AHGA’s constructive recommendations to help encourage teleworking included the following:

1. Defeat the Streamlined Sales Tax Proposal, a scheme from state and local governments that would require home-based business owners and homeowners who have their yard sales on eBay to collect sales taxes for the thousands of state and local taxing authorities across the country.

2. Develop incentives for homeowners and businesses, such as tax credits for the necessary computer hardware and broadband connections, to encourage the creation of more home-based businesses and to encourage employers and homeowners to support teleworking.

3. Enact the Telecommuter Tax Fairness Act to prohibit two state governments to tax the income of homeowners who work for out-of-state employers and sometimes work from home.

4. Provide subsidies or other incentives to encourage companies to more rapidly expand broadband access to unserved rural and underserved urban communities in order to make teleworking possible and open up educational and telemedicine opportunities to many of those homeowners and other consumers.

Several members of Congress are already championing teleworking. Representative Frank Wolf (R- VA 10) has championed teleworking for federal employees. In part as a result of his earlier initiatives some 7% of federal workers are now able to work from home on either a part time or full time basis.

In October Mr. Wolf called for the creation of a “National Telework Week” as part of his ongoing effort to promote telework in both the public and private sector. In a letter to President Bush asking for the designation, Wolf emphasized that telework should be a regular part of the 21st Century workplace. He said a National Telework Week would provide the opportunity to encourage more employers to consider telework for their employees.

“The best part of telework is that it improves the quality of life for all,” Wolf wrote. “Nearly 20 million Americans telework today, and according to experts, at least 40 percent of American jobs are compatible with telework. Telework reduces traffic congestion and air pollution. It reduces gas consumption and our dependency on foreign oil. Telework is good for families -- working parents have flexibility to meet everyday demands. Telework provides people with disabilities greater job opportunities. Telework helps fill our nation's labor market shortage. It is also a good way for retirees to pick up part-time work.”

Wolf, long recognized as a leader in the telework effort, also introduced a resolution in the House in support of a “National Telework Week.”

“National Telework Week would be an ideal time for employers, for just one day during one week of the year, to allow employees to work from home or an alternative work site to find out the benefits of telework,” Wolf said. “It’s time to give it a shot.”


top



 
Please take the time to contact your legislators and express your views on the policy issues covered in this month’s Home Base. It's easy - you can reach your legislators by email in a couple of mouse clicks, and you can use the content in Home Base and elsewhere on our website to help you develop your message. To look up the phone number, email, and/or postal address of your U.S. Representative or your two U.S. Senators, (or your state representative or state senator) click here. The site can look them up by zip code for you if you don’t recall their names.

Many legislators are also happy to meet personally with their constituents when they are back home on weekends or when Congress is not in session. A personal meeting is a particularly effective way to get their attention and reinforce your message, so please consider also requesting a follow up face-to-face meeting in their home state or home district offices near you when you contact them on policy issues.

Is there a policy issue that is particularly important to you which significantly impacts homeowners or home ownership? Any member may propose a position on a policy issue, so please check the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance's 2007 Issue Guide to see whether it’s already on our list. If it isn't on the list, we invite you to send us an email and tell us why you think the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance should be working on it.


 
 
 

Copyright 2007, American Homeowners Foundation and the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance.