Home

Home Base

A publication of
the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance and the American Homeowners Foundation
  

 www.americanhomeowners.org


Ju
ly, 2011



In this issue of Home Base:

Crunch Time for the Mortgage Interest Deduction
The Key to Safe Outdoor Summer Recreation
Government Proposes Tough Auto Efficiency Standards
HUD Announces Emergency Homeowner Loan Program
The Government Googles Google
On the Lighter Side: Housing Daffynitions


Crunch Time for the Mortgage Interest Deduction

Will it change or not?

Federal budget negotiations are moving into a critical period as the government will run out of money by August 2 unless something is done to stop it. In the last week, President Obama has stepped forward and met with both Democratic and Republican leaders in the US Senate and House of Representatives in an effort to find common ground. There is much huffing and puffing from Democratic as well as Republican leaders. A number of them will have to back down from lines they’ve drawn in the sand if a compromise is to be reached.

The alternatives to avoid exceeding the debt limit include some combination of cuts in federal spending, tax increases to generate new revenue, and increasing the debt limit itself. There is general agreement that the amount needed to close the gap is around $4 trillion. Both parties agree on the need for spending cuts, but Republicans want to cut much deeper than Democrats are willing to go, focusing on far deeper spending cuts in social programs such as Medicare. Conversely, most Republicans are adamantly opposed to any tax increases, while most Democrats would support some business tax increases and personal income tax increases for taxpayers earning over $250,000 annually.

In the mix of possible budget cuts and tax increases are possible changes to the mortgage interest deduction. It is one of the possible alternatives recommended by the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (AKA the President’s bipartisan deficit commission). Their proposal is to reduce the cap on the mortgage interest deduction from the current $1 million level to $500,000, and replace the deduction with a 12% mortgage interest tax credit available to all taxpayers. The latter would create, for the first time, an incentive for home ownership for many moderate income taxpayers. Today many families with incomes below $45,000 who buy homes with mortgages of $140,000 or less get no federal tax benefit from the mortgage interest deduction. In terms of tax liability they are just as well off – or better off - with the standard deduction. The President’s bipartisan deficit commission estimated that this change would produce a huge amount of new tax revenue, as the proceeds from reducing the cap would far exceed the revenue losses from moderate income home buyers who take advantage of the new 12% mortgage interest tax credit.

The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance believes the commission’s revenue estimates are likely wrong. The new 12% mortgage interest tax credit is likely to create an explosion of new moderate income buyers who snap up the current huge surplus of inexpensive distressed homes on the market. Everyone who takes advantage of the tax credit will eat into the new revenues generated by reducing the cap on the mortgage interest deductions to $500,000. The number of consumers who earn less than $45,000 annually is immensely larger than the number of homeowners who earn enough to support a mortgage in the $500,000 - $1,000,000 range. The net result is that the proposal is more likely to reduce federal tax revenues because so many more consumers will have a tax incentive for home ownership. In our minds, this simultaneous increase and redistribution of tax benefits would be good policy however. It would create an incentive for home ownership for moderate income home buyers for the first time, and would revitalize the housing market.

As of this writing it appears that the overall $4 trillion goal cannot be met by August 2. Negotiations between Vice President Biden and Congressional leaders identified about $1 trillion in savings agreeable to both parties. Those talks broke down, which is why President Obama has stepped in to negotiate directly with Congressional leaders. However, it is unclear how much more saving can realistically be achieved by the August 2 deadline. What is emerging as the most likely outcome to the debt ceiling debate is a stopgap agreement that might, at best, reach half of the $4 trillion goal, with the resolution of how to achieve the other half to be deferred until later.

Republicans are playing hardball. Their current position is that they will support a $ 2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling only if there is a $2 trillion cut in spending with no new taxes on either the wealthy individuals or corporations. Many Democrats are also engaged in brinkmanship, refusing to consider any cuts in Medicare or other social programs and insisting that a corporate and wealthy individual tax increase be included in the package.

AHGA believes the deficit solution will have to occur in two acts. There will be a saving in the neighborhood of $2 trillion in the current round of negotiations, combined with a temporary $2 trillion increase in the debt limit. This will be followed by an additional (and much tougher to achieve) $2 trillion in savings in a subsequent round of negotiations. We do not believe that there is great likelihood that the mortgage interest deduction will be modified in the current round of negotiations. There is a pretty wide gap to broach however. Both parties will have to give in somewhere, and some folks will face an unpleasant surprise at the end.

What’s most important is that party leaders abandon their current practice of brinkmanship and start working together until the goal is achieved. The Cochairmen of the Presidents Deficit Commission shared similar views in a June 27 editorial in The Hill, http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/168591-whats-needed-a-4-trillion-gimmick-free-deficit-deal-in-two-parts, and we couldn’t agree with them more. 

AHGA believes that party leaders on both sides must put our nation's long term health ahead of the selfish biases of extremists within their own party. It may help them to consider as they continue their negotiations that the vote of political moderates will decide the fate of the upcoming election. Political moderate democrats, republicans, and independents outnumber both the number of inflexible conservatives or inflexible liberals who are unwilling to make any compromises whatsoever in order to solve these problems. The party that pays least attention to this reality will pay the most next November.

top


The Key to Safe Outdoor Summer Recreation

When Thunder Roars, Go Indoors!

Summers are wonderful times for homeowners to enjoy the great outdoors. Gardening, Fourth of July parties, trips to the beach and many other enjoyable outdoor activities await us. As we enjoy our summer outdoors fun we need to remember that each year in the United States, more than 400 people are struck by lightning. On average, between 55 and 60 people are killed; hundreds of others suffer permanent neurological disabilities. Most of these tragedies can be avoided with a few simple precautions. When thunderstorms threaten, get to a safe place. Lightning safety is an inconvenience that can save your life.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) collects information on weather-related deaths to learn how to prevent these tragedies. Many lightning victims say they were “caught” outside in the storm and couldn’t get to a safe place. With proper planning, these tragedies could be prevented.

Other victims waited too long before seeking shelter. By heading to a safe place 5 to 10 minutes sooner, they could have avoided being struck by lightning. Some people were struck because they went back outside too soon. Stay inside a safe building or vehicle for at least 30 minutes after you hear the last thunder clap.

Finally, some victims were struck inside homes or buildings while they were using electrical equipment or corded phones. Others were in contact with plumbing, a metal door or a window frame. Avoid contact with these electrical conductors when a thunderstorm is nearby! All thunderstorms produce lightning and are dangerous. In the United States, in an average year, lightning kills about the same number of people as tornadoes and more people than hurricanes.

Lightning often strikes outside the area of heavy rain and may strike as far as 10 miles from any rainfall. Many lightning deaths occur ahead of storms or after storms have seemingly passed.

If you can hear thunder, you are in danger. Don’t be fooled by blue skies. If you hear thunder, lightning is close enough to pose an immediate threat.

Lightning leaves many victims with permanent disabilities. While a small percentage of lightning strike victims die, many survivors must learn to live with very serious lifelong pain and neurological disabilities.

Homeowners should have a lightning safety plan. Know where you’ll go for safety and how much time it will take to get there. Make sure your plan allows enough time to reach safety.

Before going outdoors, check the forecast for thunderstorms. Consider postponing activities to avoid being caught in a dangerous situation.

Monitor the weather. Look for signs of a developing thunderstorm such as darkening skies, flashes of lightning or increasing wind. If you hear thunder, even a distant rumble, immediately move to a safe place. Fully enclosed buildings with wiring and plumbing provide the best protection. Sheds, picnic shelters, tents or covered porches do NOT protect you from lightning.

If a sturdy building is not nearby, get into a hard-topped metal vehicle and close all the windows. Stay inside until 30 minutes after the last rumble of thunder. If you hear thunder, don’t use a corded phone except in an emergency. Cordless phones and cell phones are safe to use.

Keep away from electrical equipment and wiring. Water pipes conduct electricity. Don’t take a bath or shower or use other plumbing during a storm. If you’re outside and hear thunder, the only way to significantly reduce your risk of becoming a lightning casualty is to get inside a substantial building or hard-topped metal vehicle as fast as you can.

Remember – there is no substitute for getting to a safe place. Avoid open areas. Don’t be the tallest object in the area. Stay away from isolated tall trees, towers or utility poles. Lightning tends to strike the taller objects in an area. Stay away from metal conductors such as wires or fences. Metal does not attract lightning, but lightning can travel long distances through it.

If you are with a group of people, spread out. While this actually increases the chance that someone might get struck, it tends to prevent multiple casualties, and increases the chances that someone could help if a person is struck.

Lightning victims do not carry an electrical charge, are safe to touch, and need urgent medical attention. Cardiac arrest is the immediate cause of death for those who die. Some deaths can be prevented if the victim receives the proper first aid immediately. Call 9-1-1 or your local ambulance service for help. Do not delay CPR if the person is unresponsive or not breathing. Use an Automatic External Defibrillator if one is available. If possible, move the victim to a safer place. Lightning can strike twice.

To make sure you’re not caught in a storm listen to NOAA Weather Radio or local news stations for National Weather Service (NWS) or local forecaster severe thunderstorm watches and warnings for storms that produce damaging wind or hail. Remember, When Thunder Roars Go Indoors. 

top


Government Proposes Tough Auto Efficiency Standards

What kind of mileage do you get while it’s parked in your driveway?

White House officials have outlined a plan to double the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks from current levels to 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025. The requirements, developed by the Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency, would raise the average 2025 new car cost between $770 and $3,500.

Environmentalists have generally praised the plan, although some were pushing for an even higher standard. Auto manufacturers have claimed that the plan would effectively require most new vehicles sold in the U.S. to be battery-powered by 2025 and raise new prices by $6,000 or more. Auto makers whose product mix includes bigger cars and sport-utility vehicles would like lower mandatory mpg increases and prohibitions against states from setting their own fuel standards. These include US companies such as General Motors and Ford.

The American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance believes that the current focus of this policy initiative is too narrow. The overall objective should be to reduce US hydrocarbon fuel consumption by the most cost efficient means possible, and higher mileage standards are only part of the solution. Another way to reduce gas consumption is to create incentives for actions that would reduce the use of automobiles. For example if you telecommute to work your car stays in the driveway. You’ll save time, money, and avoid rush hour traffic jams, while reducing the rush hour traffic other commuters face. If you order products online instead of driving to the mall you also don’t need to drive. The products will be delivered by the postal carrier or the UPS and FedEx trucks come through your neighborhood every day anyway, and you’ll save time, money, and avoid the traffic.

It would almost certainly be less expensive to take a more balanced approach to reducing fuel consumption than trying to achieve it all through mileage standards. If you applied part of the additional amount it would cost in 2025 to build a vehicle that would achieve 56.2 miles per gallon to federal incentives for individuals and businesses to forgo the use of vehicles altogether it would result in a huge reduction in fuel consumption. Since the average of the Administration’s highest and the industry’s lowest unit cost estimates to achieve 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025 is $4,750 a vehicle there is a lot of federal funding that could be partially redirected to incentives that would eliminate a substantial amount of automotive use. Examples would be tax incentives to encourage telecommuting instead of driving to work or the creation of home-based businesses. Policy changes that would encourage consumers to buy more products and services online rather than driving to the mall would also greatly reduce auto usage.

Federal legislation has resulted in a significant increase in telecommuting by federal workers. A total of 32% of federal employees now telecommute at least part of the time. The government saved about $30 million alone when employees worked from home during last year’s historic Washington, DC area snowstorms. Gas consumption was also reduced, saving the workers money and helping the environment.

Unfortunately, that legislation does not apply to the much larger private sector, and telecommuting in the U.S. trails that of other countries by a substantial margin. In the United States only 2% of the population telecommutes, compared to 4% in Canada and 5% in the United Kingdom.

A federal tax credit for amounts spent by an employer or employee on hardware, software, and/or broadband services necessary to enable telecommuting, or the creation of a home based business would accelerate private sector teleworking. An Internet sales tax moratorium would encourage more consumers to order online rather than drive to the mall. A Parade Magazine reader survey revealed that 87% of respondents favor an Internet sales tax moratorium. Many state and local governments already exempt some products from sales taxes (prescription drugs, temporary sales tax holidays for back to school purchases), so there is ample precedent for such a moratorium.

The goal here should be to get the biggest bang for the buck in achieving reductions in hydrocarbon fuel consumption. The U.S. economy is in bad shape, and increasing the cost of a car by $4,750 a vehicle isn’t good for consumers, auto workers or auto manufacturers. It would be far less popular than these other less expensive options, which would also deliver immediate savings to workers and consumers. It is likely that we can achieve the same results in reduced fuel consumption with a more comprehensive and balanced policy package that included incentives for teleworking, a moratorium on Internet sales taxes, and more modest 2025 fuel standards.

We would all be winners, especially consumers. They would save huge amounts on annual gas expenses, and even consumers who didn’t take advantage of the incentives would save as a result of reduced gas demand and resulting pump prices. Environmentalists will also have achieved their policy objectives. The mpg standards for new cars could still be increased significantly, but the unit vehicle cost would be far less than $4,750 that would be unaffordable for most consumers, threaten the jobs of auto workers and the viability of the US auto industry.

Both new legislation and new regulations will take some time to implement. In the meantime, here are some gas-saving tips you can use today.

Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration and braking) wastes gas. It can lower your gas mileage by 33 percent at highway speeds and by 5 percent around town. Sensible driving is also safer for you and others, so you may save more than gas money.

While each vehicle reaches its optimal fuel economy at a different speed (or range of speeds), gas mileage usually decreases rapidly at speeds above 60 mph. Each 5 mph you drive over 60 mph is like paying about an additional $0.30 per gallon for gas. Observing the speed limit is also safer as well.

Avoid keeping unnecessary items in your vehicle, especially heavy ones. An extra 100 pounds in your vehicle could reduce your MPG by up to 2 percent. The reduction is based on the percentage of extra weight relative to the vehicle's weight and affects smaller vehicles more than larger ones.

Idling can use a quarter to a half gallon of fuel per hour, depending on engine size and air conditioner (AC) use. Turn off your engine when your vehicle is parked. It only takes a few seconds worth of fuel to restart your vehicle. Turning your engine on and off excessively, however, may increase starter wear.

Using cruise control on the highway helps you maintain a constant speed and, in most cases, will save gas. When you use overdrive gearing, your car's engine speed goes down. This saves gas and reduces engine wear.

Fixing a car that is noticeably out of tune or has failed an emissions test can improve its gas mileage by an average of 4 percent, though results vary based on the kind of repair and how well it is done. Fixing a serious maintenance problem, such as a faulty oxygen sensor, can improve your mileage by as much as 40 percent. 

Improve your gas mileage by up to 3.3 percent by keeping your tires inflated to the proper pressure. Under-inflated tires can lower gas mileage by 0.3 percent for every 1 psi drop in pressure of all four tires. Properly inflated tires are safer and last longer. A tire pressure gauge is small, fits easily in your glove compartment, and only costs a couple bucks. The proper tire pressure for your vehicle is usually found on a sticker in the driver's side door jamb or the glove compartment and in your owner's manual. Do not use the maximum pressure printed on the tire's sidewall.

You can improve your gas mileage by 1–2 percent by using the manufacturer's recommended grade of motor oil. For example, using 10W-30 motor oil in an engine designed to use 5W-30 can lower your gas mileage by 1–2 percent. Using 5W-30 in an engine designed for 5W-20 can lower your gas mileage by 1–1.5 percent. Also, look for motor oil that says "Energy Conserving" on the API performance symbol to be sure it contains friction-reducing additives.

Replacing a clogged air filter on an older car with a carbureted engine may improve fuel economy 2 to 6 percent under normal replacement conditions or up to 14 percent if the filter is so clogged that it significantly affects drivability.

Combining errands into one trip saves you time and money. Several short trips taken from a cold start can use twice as much fuel as a longer multipurpose trip covering the same distance when the engine is warm. Trip planning ensures that traveling is done when the engine is warmed-up and efficient, and it can reduce the distance you travel.

Encourage your employer to allow you to telecommute one or more days a week or compress your workweek (i.e. four 10 hour days instead of 5 8 hour days). Alternatively, stagger your work hours to avoid peak rush hours.

Take advantage of carpools and ride-share programs. You can cut your weekly fuel costs in half and save wear on your car if you take turns driving with other commuters. Many urban areas allow vehicles with multiple passengers to use High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes which are typically less congested, further improving your fuel economy.

Use public transit if it is available and convenient for you. The
American Public Transit Transportation Association has links to information about public transportation in your state.

A roof rack or carrier provides additional cargo space and may allow you to meet your needs with a smaller car. However, a loaded roof rack can decrease your fuel economy by 5 percent. Reduce aerodynamic drag and improve your fuel economy by placing items inside the trunk whenever possible.

Next time you buy a new or used car, get a more gas efficient vehicle. The difference between a car that gets 20 MPG and one that gets 30 MPG amounts to $945 per year (assuming 15,000 miles of driving annually and a fuel cost of $3.78).  Use
www.fueleconomy.gov's Find and Compare Cars section to find the most fuel efficient vehicle that will meet your needs. Consumer Reports Magazine also provides new and used car reliability ratings every year in their April issue.

top


HUD Announces Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program

Interest free loans are intended to help homeowners at risk of foreclosure.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in conjunction with NeighborWorks® America announced the launch of the Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program (EHLP) on June 20. The aim is to help homeowners in 27 states across the country and Puerto Rico who are at risk of foreclosure. The EHLP program is a complement to the existing Hardest Hit Fund, which makes available $7.6 billion to 18 states and the District of Columbia that were hardest hit by the housing crisis.

Congress provided $1 billion dollars to HUD, as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, to implement EHLP. The program will assist homeowners who have experienced a reduction in income and are at risk of foreclosure due to involuntary unemployment or underemployment, due to economic conditions or a medical condition. Under EHLP program guidelines eligible homeowners can qualify for an interest free loan which pays a portion of their monthly mortgage for up to two years, or up to $50,000, whichever comes first.

"Through the Emergency Homeowners’ Loan Program the Obama Administration is continuing our strong commitment to help keep families in their homes during tough economic times," said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. "Working with our community partners across the nation through NeighborWorks® America, we are pleased to launch this program today in 27 states and Puerto Rico to help families keep their homes while looking for work or recovering from illness." 

The EHLP program will pay a portion of an approved applicant’s monthly mortgage including missed mortgage payments or past due charges including principal, interest, taxes, insurances, and attorney fees. EHLP is expected to aid up to 30,000 distressed borrowers, with an average loan of approximately $35,000.

"Through our work around the country, NeighborWorks® America knows all too well that in these tough economic times, homeowners facing foreclosure are seeking help wherever they can find it. The deadline is July 22, 2011, so we encourage homeowners to apply now in order to find out if they qualify for this new mortgage assistance program and learn more about the many options available to assist those with housing needs," stated Eileen M. Fitzgerald, CEO of NeighborWorks® America.

The EHLP program will be offered in the following states: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming and Puerto Rico. Five states operating substantially similar programs are administering EHLP directly: Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.

Contact information for participating agencies, the Pre-Applicant Screening Worksheet and more information on the EHLP program and its eligibility requirements can be found at
www.FindEHLP.org or by calling toll free at 855-FIND-EHLP (346-3345).

top


The Government Googles Google

The FTC aims its search engine at Mr. “Do No Evil”.  

Federal regulators have launched an investigation into whether Google has abused its dominance in Internet search advertising. With over 2/3 of all U.S. web searches, Google is an important tool that is helpful to homeowners and other consumers. To “Google” something has become part of our lexicon. The FTC’s investigation is a continuation of the technology sector precedent set by the Justice Department in its landmark case against Microsoft in the 1990s.

In the latter case, the government recognized that market dominance in one sector (operating systems) can create tremendous opportunities to achieve dominance in other areas (browsers in Microsoft’s case). The outcome in the Microsoft case was a consent agreement in which Microsoft agreed to change practices that gave unfair advantage to its browser or created barriers to the use of other browsers with the Microsoft operating system.

The European Commission began its own formal investigation into Google’s competition practices last November, and the attorneys general of Texas, New York, California and Ohio have also begun investigations of Google. Both the FTC civil probe and the European Commission investigation may potentially reshape Internet competition, and will certainly not help Google’s increasingly tarnished reputation.

The core of the FTC probe is to determine whether Google searches unfairly steer users to the company's own growing network of services instead of rival providers. If that is what is happening it is bad for consumers because it would mean that Google is purposely steering you away from the websites that best match your needs as defined by your search terms. There is significant evidence that these practices are commonplace. For example many mortgage lenders and credit card companies who do not have advertizing arrangements with Google have charged that Google searches for mortgages or credit cards seem to be directed to Google’s affiliates.

The most dominant tool for getting driving directions is MapQuest, and “MapQuesting” directions is also part of our technological lexicon. Despite this fact Google searches for driving direction tools often rank the lesser known Google Maps at the top of an organic search, while MapQuest often doesn’t appear until the second page of search results. Other companies also believe that Google is unfairly skewing search results towards its own services or those of its affiliates. They include Microsoft and travel services Expedia Inc., Kayak.com, and Sabre Holdings, health site WebMD.com, and Yelp.com.

It is difficult to understand why there would be so many anomalies in Google’s natural searches, which the company claims are formula driven. However, Google doesn’t reveal the formulas for those protocols, claiming that would lead to more intense search “gaming” by companies that would manipulate the rules to get higher rankings than they deserve. Nonetheless it is difficult to understand how competing Google services and affiliates are apparently ranking so much higher in Google searches than their competitors unless they have access to those protocols, or Google is purposely overriding its own natural search protocols.

We believe that this case, like the Microsoft case, will take several years to resolve. It will result in a consent agreement under which Google will be required to cease practices that give unfair advantage to its own services or its affiliates. It’s also possible that the FTC will also require Google to drop its current company motto (“Do no evil”) as part of the settlement on the grounds that it constitutes false advertising. What is also likely is that the Google case may be followed by other investigations of other Internet companies who may be using their dominance in one area to achieve unfair advantages elsewhere. Allegations of similar types of practices by dominant Internet based firms have been made against Facebook, which could easily be next in line.

top


On the Lighter Side: Housing Daffynitions

Here are some alternative real estate jargon definitions for home buyers and sellers.

Acceleration Clause - When it is okay to speed
Amortization Schedule - A specified date night
Appreciation - What every husband wants but never gets
Chain of Title - Your house, your problem
Common Area Assessments - What your mother in law does when she visits
Community Property - How your kids view everything that is yours
Discount Points - Kohl's offers those on Super Saturdays
Due On Sale Provision - The right your husband has to pull his favorite chair out of the garage sale just when someone is about to buy it
Earnest Money Deposit - The money you meant to put into your checking account before that check bounced
Effective Age - How old you really feel
Eminent Domain - That feeling you get the moment your kids ask to move back home after college
Encroachment - What happens when your kids move back home after college
Loan Servicing - Creative ways to pay back a debt
Negative Amortization - It sets in after the honeymoon
Quit Claim Deed - Something you did when no one was looking, so you can deny it
Right of First Refusal - How most husbands view their authority over the remote control
Right of Survivorship - Getting to vote on who gets thrown off the island
Settlement Statement - Having the last word in an argument
Sweat Equity - It is usually a little more salty than sweet
Tenancy in Common - A stubborn virus that makes its way through the whole family

 

Please take the time to contact your legislators and express your views on pending policy issues covered in this month’s Home Base. It's easy - you can reach your legislators by email in a couple of mouse clicks, and you can use the content in Home Base and elsewhere on our website to help you develop your message.

To look up the phone number, email, and/or postal address of your U.S. Representative or your two U.S. Senators, (or your state representative or state senator) click here. You can also look up which legislators represent your zip code if you don’t recall their names.

A personal meeting is a particularly effective way to get their attention and reinforce your message.   Please consider requesting a face-to-face meeting in their home state or home district offices near you when you contact their Washington DC offices on policy issues. 

Is there a policy issue that is particularly important to you which significantly impacts homeowners or home ownership? Any member may propose a position on a policy issue, so please check the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance's 2011 Issue Guide. If it isn't on the list, we invite you to send us an email and tell us why you think the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance should take a position and work on it.

 

Copyright 2011, American Homeowners Foundation and the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance.