Forces Combining to Reclaim Consumer
Real Estate Choice
Efforts by consumer organizations to protect the right
of consumers to choose various tools to buy and s ell
homes are beginning to pay off. Major real estate
corporations and state real estate trade associations
recently lost in a state effort to deny consumer’s
access to an increasingly popular cost-saving marketing
tool. In another state plans for a similar effort were
dropped. In a third state real estate professionals are
taking a welcome and more moderated approach that we
hope will serve as a model for future collaboration
between the real estate professionals and consumers.
Although the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has
refused to budge from its support for anti-consumer
industry “opt-out” regulations in the face of a lawsuit
from the U.S. Department of Justice, things are starting
to look up at the state level. In many states consumers
can use a “list-only” discount broker to put their home
in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) for as little as
$200. This is a critical step in marketing a home since
80% of home buyers now conduct at least part of their
search on the Internet and MLS listing info is
distributed broadly on the Internet. This can save
consumers a great amount compared to the typical 5-6%
commission, but for that low rate the homeowners have to
hold their own open houses and conduct their own
negotiations.
Language in Kentucky legislation outlawing the practice
was removed in mid-February. In Virginia the state real
estate association has taken a much more measured
approach. Pending Virginia legislation would mandate
that minimum service brokers disclose to consumers in
writing what services they provide or don’t provide.
“This is far preferable to denying homeowners their
choice of alternative business models in real estate
transactions”, said AHGA President Bruce Hahn.
State real estate commissioners in Idaho have reportedly
abandoned regulatory efforts to propose make it illegal
for a discount broker to offer as its only service the
listing of a home in the MLS’s They also abandoned an
alternative approach of supporting state legislation to
accomplish the same objective. This is a sign that state
real estate associations are beginning to have second
thoughts about supporting efforts that defy U.S.
antitrust laws and tarnish their image among American
homeowners.
There’s even better news. In Virginia legislators have
introduced minimum services disclosure legislation. It
requires minimum service brokers to disclose to
consumers the services they do and do not provide
consumers but does not prohibit any business model. The
legislation was strongly supported by the Virginia
Association of Realtors (VAR), which had wisely heeded
the constructive advance suggestions of the U.S.
Department of Justice in developing the legislation. “We
commend VAR for this constructive approach” observed
AHGA President Bruce Hahn. “We hope it will serve as a
model to other state real estate associations who have
sought to get their real estate commissions and/or their
state legislators to defy our nation’s antitrust laws
and trample the rights of homeowners”, he added.
The continuing debate over consumer choice in real
estate is also energizing more consumer organizations to
get involved. AHGA, the Consumer Federation of America
(CFA), and the Virginia Consumer Coalition recently sent
a joint letter to Virginia legislators endorsing the
Virginia legislation and making constructive suggestions
to further improve it. “We hope that this might also
lead to a constructive dialogue between VAR and consumer
groups in Virginia where we could exchange ideas in
advance on issues impacting both Realtors and homeowners
and thereby avoid the kinds of problems that have
occurred in other states,” Hahn added.
The growing number of real estate disclosure violations
need to be addressed anyway, and legislation or
regulations addressing disclosure issues like the
Virginia bill will provide vehicles to achieve that
objective. “Although agency disclosure is required by
state law that homebuyers are told the role of their
real estate agent in the sales process, and most
importantly, whom the agent represents, less than
one-third of real estate agents comply, according to the
National Association of Realtors' 2005 Profile of Home
Buyers and Sellers.” In the same article in an industry
trade publication Laurie Janik, general counsel for the
NAR, said that "These statistics are truly disappointing
to me. I would have thought the numbers on compliance
with agency disclosures would be increasing year by year
as agents become accustomed to making them on a regular
basis."
AHGA fully agrees with that assessment. According to
data in NARs own 2005 Legal Scan which tracks lawsuits
against real estate agents and brokers, agency
disclosure related lawsuits account for over 24% of real
estate sales transaction-related lawsuits, the largest
single category. AHGA suggests that any state real
estate legislation or regulation related to discount
broker disclosures be broadened to address this serious
problem. AHGA would like to see all required real estate
disclosures be provided in writing in plain English at
the first personal meeting with a prospective client.
Fines for noncompliance would also help address the
problems identified by both NAR and AHGA.
To be sure challenges still remain. Legislation and
regulations that would reduce consumer choice in real
estate services is pending in other states, and the
companies driving the effort to deny consumers choice in
real estate services (the large real estate
conglomerates according to an industry trade
publication) have given no indication that they intend
to abandon the effort. For that reason AHGA is
continuing its 2006 Homeowners' Rights Campaign to
educate key state leaders across the country about the
anticompetitive and anticonsumer efforts to deny choice
to American homeowners.
Nevertheless there are numerous signs that we may be
turning the corner, and that in the future consumers
will have an expanding choice of cost-saving choices in
real estate services, and hopefully better and earlier
compliance with all real estate disclosure laws.
top
Remodeling: The
Next Big Thing
The red hot real estate market has been the object of most
peoples attention in recent years, but as home resales start
to cool off remodeling will likely become the next real
estate big thing.
Remodeling has continued to grow throughout the real estate
boom. Home improvement spending by homeowners grew by 4.5
percent last year, with owner-occupants investing $149.5
billion in their homes, according to Harvard's Joint Center
for Housing Studies. The Center predicts a 4% growth in
2006, but AHGA believes a number of factors may push that
figure considerably higher, perhaps to 8% this year:
●
There’s a lot of home equity out there. Thanks to home
appreciation in recent years many move up buyers are sitting
on cash they took out when they sold their last house.
●
With mortgage rates inching up, remodeling is becoming more
attractive than moving up. If you were lucky enough to buy
or refinance your home in the last few years you probably
have the best mortgage rate you’re likely to see for a long
time. Why move and give up that sweet mortgage rate if you
have cash from your last home or can affordably finance the
much smaller cost of a remodeling job with a home equity
loan?
●
Members of the huge Baby Boom
generation have been spending twice as much on remodeling as
the World War II generation that preceded them, according to
the Harvard study. With medical advances enabling more
seniors to live in their homes longer, a growing focus of
remodeling will be on senior mobility issues.
●
For more homeowners, “moving
up” is more a matter of livability than square footage. Baby
boomers and older Gen Xers are becoming empty nesters, many
more interested in a top of the line kitchen or master bath
upgrade than they are in a bigger home with more bedrooms.
●
Federal tax incentives for
home remodeling projects to enhance energy efficiency kicked
in on January 1 of this year, and will be in effect until
the end of 2007. With the costs of home heating and cooling
skyrocketing, AHGA predicts that many homeowners will want
to take advantage of those tax incentives, and many of those
remodeling projects will no doubt incorporate quality of
life improvements.
All in all, the outlook is bright for home remodeling, but
homeowners need to approach the home remodeling process
carefully and thoughtfully. Consumer complaints about
remodeling contractors are the perennial most frequent
complaint received by the American Homeowners Foundation,
and are always in the Better Business Bureau’s top 3 list-
often second or first. The Foundation has
free
home tips and the National Association of Home Builders
(NAHB) has just published a free guide called "How to Find a
Professional Remodeler." While there are no guarantees, a
remodeler who belongs to NAHB’s Remodelers Council, the
National Association of the Remodeling Industry, or any of
the other remodeling sector trade associations, is more
likely to have benefited from continuing education and have
a commitment to his trade, than someone who does not belong
to an industry trade group.
The single most important thing a homeowner should do in any
remodeling project is to insist on a comprehensive written
contract describing all the terms, the work to be done,
payment schedules, dispute resolution methodology, etc. A
one page bid sheet is not comprehensive enough, and you
should never base a remodeling agreement on a handshake. A
comprehensive written contract will not only offer
protection against dishonest contractors, it will also help
prevent the miscommunication that leads to many disputes
between honest parties. There are several sample remodeling
contracts available, including AHF’s comprehensive plain
English Home Remodeling contract.
top

How Would You Like to Save $600 a Year?
We are on the cusp of a national price war in TV services
competition that can save consumers billions of dollars. If
legislators, federal regulators, and municipal officials
will modernize the outdated TV franchise process, consumers
will save as much as $600 annually as new competitors to
cable TV company monopolies drive down the price of TV
services.
Past Federal Communications Commission (FCC) studies
revealed that the price of TV services dropped an average of
15% when new competitors entered the market. More recent
data however, suggests that consumer savings may be far
greater. A 2006 Bank of America study found that in three
different markets there was an immediate average annual TV
services subscription rate price cut of $242.23, or 36%,
when a new competitor was allowed to compete with the local
cable TV monopoly. In one Texas market the incumbent cable
provider dropped their premium service package rates by 50%
when a competitor announced plans to enter their market late
last year, a price cut of $50 a month or $600 a year. “This
is a substantial share of a typical homeowner’s remaining
disposable annual income after they pay their mortgage and
other necessary living costs.” observed AHGA President Bruce
Hahn in the Alliance’s
February 13 FCC
submission. “There are few if any other areas where a
federal agency could save consumers this much money by
simply streamlining a few rules.”
In its FCC comments, AHGA noted that encouraging more TV
services competition will also benefit homeowners and other
consumers in other ways as well. TV services are only one of
several types of broadband services. Any regulatory
initiative that fosters deployment of more broadband
alternatives in TV services also encourages more competition
in other areas of broadband as well.
All of these services are saving overburdened, dual income
homeowners a tremendous amount of time, and reducing traffic
and pollution from trips to libraries, government offices,
malls, and video rental stores. As more powerful broadband
alternatives proliferate the number and technological
sophistication of home-based businesses will grow even more
dramatically.
Last year, 82.5 million workers world-wide worked at home at
least one day a month, more than double the figure from
2000, according to Gartner Inc., a technology research firm.
Teleworking and home-based businesses both contribute to the
quality of homeowner’s lives and reduce pollution.
Wider use of integrated home based monitoring and
intervention systems for patients with chronic illnesses
will allow many senior and other homeowners to remain in
their own homes, instead of being forced into nursing homes.
Telemedicine (two-way video communication between patients
and health care providers) will also help in that regard.
These technologies will also eliminate the need for many
in-person visits to health care providers and save
homeowners and the federal government billions of dollars in
health care costs.
The consumer benefits of more competition in TV services and
other areas of broadband overwhelm arguments for continued
excessive regulation of TV services. It is clear that the
issue of TV services competition has extremely broad
implications. AHGA believes that the franchise negotiation
process could be shortened to a few days by adopting
standard terms with regards to Public, Education, and
Government (PEG) channels, franchise fees, and
anti-redlining. The commission should also develop standard
franchise terms, and should determine that any franchise
which attempts to go beyond those terms or takes more than
15 days to negotiate is unreasonable. This would not
interfere with local government’s control over the
rights-of-way or with ensuring that cable television remains
a vehicle for local programming. In taking this action, the
commission can save consumers billions of dollars on their
TV service bills, and speed the rollout of advanced
broadband services.
Some municipal governments have welcomed new competitors to
cable TV monopolies and others are proceeding down that
path, albeit slowly. However still others are balking and
some may never agree to allow new competitors to the local
cable monopoly. To try to expedite consumer savings and
choice, Texas has moved forward with statewide video
franchising laws and others are considering them as well.
Statewide laws will greatly expedite the rollout of
competition to the cable TV monopolies and get savings into
American homeowner’s pockets even sooner.
Federal legislators are also considering national
legislation to expedite competition in TV services. Sen.
John Ensign (R-NV) hopes his legislation to let telephone
companies and other video providers obtain nationwide
franchises will be woven into broader legislation. A House
companion measure would exempt video providers from
obtaining local franchises while still requiring franchise
fees. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK)
is developing a plan under which a federal-state panel would
propose changes to franchising laws in an effort to bring
about uniformity in the process.
All of this is extremely good news for American homeowners
and other consumers. We can only win in what we hope will
become a race between federal, state, and local officials to
see which can do the most to encourage TV services
competition the soonest.
top
President Offers Support for Energy Independence
In
this year's State of the Union President Bush strongly
endorsed needed steps towards U.S. energy independence.
"America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from
unstable parts of the world," said the President in an
understatement. President Bush called for a national oil
savings target and said that "The best way to break this
addiction is through technology."
OPEC officials noted after the President's address that
efforts to reduce dependence on Middle Eastern oil would
discourage increased investment in Persian Gulf production.
This only reinforces the need to use technology and
alternative fuels to increase fuel choice and reduce demand
for oil.
Congress last year extended tax incentives for alternative
fuel vehicles and passed a bevy of other modest energy
incentives that will reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
Among them are tax incentives for homeowners who add
additional insulation or energy efficiency technologies to
their homes, and similar incentives to home builders to
build super energy efficient new homes. “These incentives
need to be expanded and extended” says AHGA President Bruce
Hahn. Two thirds of our oil consumption is in the
transportation sector, mostly by cars and trucks. The
President’s focus on all types of hybrid vehicles is
therefore entirely appropriate. “However, home heating and
cooling also account for a large share of direct and
indirect oil consumption, and the incredible increases in
home heating costs are hurting many homeowners this winter,”
Hahn added. “We need to give temporary financial assistance
for those cost increases this winter to homeowners who need
it, but the long term solution must include reducing the
energy consumption of American homes and shifting our energy
dependence away from oil and more towards passive and active
solar and nuclear technologies.”
"Energy independence is a matter of national security and
its urgency demands that we take action now," Senator
Lieberman (D-CT) said recently. "Last fall a large
bipartisan -- and bicameral -- coalition of Senators and
Representatives came together to offer a comprehensive bill
that would turn the rhetoric of energy security into reality
by saving millions of barrels of oil in just a few years,
and bringing new fuels and technologies to market within
five years. The best way to reach the goals President Bush
talked about in his State of the Union is for Congress to
enact this legislation and for the President to support it
and sign it into law."
There are a number of interesting home-related energy
projects underway. A new "GridWise" energy project involving
IBM, Whirlpool and the Department of Energy (DoE) will use
the latest technology to tell homeowners how much money they
are spending on electricity. A project being tested in
Washington state and Oregon will send e-mail alerts to homes
when their monthly power bills exceed their household
budgets. The "intelligent" power-grid technology then will
turn down their thermostats automatically. While they can
override those settings, the project should make
participating homeowners very aware of how much they might
save if they dress a little more warmly inside their home.
DoE plans to give money to those among the 300 participating
households who decrease energy use.
In a second study, participants will receive a high-tech
Sears Whirlpool dryer that can sense instability in the
power grid and shut off its heating element for a few
minutes to conserve energy, while it continues in tumble
mode. The appliances could drastically reduce power demand,
and the power grid instability that occurs about once a day
in that area. Washington was selected because the Northwest
region of our National Grid is under the most serious strain
due to large population and industrial growth.
Broader adoption of these technologies could eventually save
consumers as much as $80 billion in 20 years by precluding
the necessity for constructing new power distribution
equipment or substations.
In the meantime homeowners should take steps to cut down
home energy costs on their own, The American Homeowners
Foundation has developed a free ten minute home energy audit
that enables homeowners to identify simple steps they can
take to improve home energy efficiency using a few simple
tools while taking a self guided walk-through of the rooms
in their home. At the Department of Energy's Web site (www.energy.gov),
can also find ways to find air leaks in their home and learn
how to stop them.
top
AHGA Calls for End of New Homes Tax
In February 14 testimony submitted to the Senate Commerce
Committee, the American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance (AHGA),
asked Congress to take action to relieve homeowners from the
“New Homes Tax”, which adds an estimated $1,000 to the price
of new U.S. homes and raises the cost of many remodeling
projects.
These tariffs make homes less affordable, especially to the
most vulnerable first time buyers who account for a
substantial portion of the nation’s annual new home sales.
The tax prices almost 300,000 families out of the market and
would make home additions and other remodeling projects
unaffordable for many more homeowners. It will add
substantially to taxpayer contributions to the cost of
rebuilding homes destroyed by Hurricane Katrina.
These tariffs amount to 10% of the lumber price. They were
imposed at the behest of large U.S. lumber producers on
softwood imported from Canada for use in homebuilding. “We
believe these tariffs are nothing but protectionism for the
major U.S. tree farmers” said AHGA President Bruce Hahn.
“They are paid for by every homeowner who buys a new home
and the builder just passes the tax up the line.” he added.
AHGA believes that a free trade policy is in the best
long-term interest of the US and other countries, and
results in the greatest benefit to homeowners and other
consumers in all countries. The fast changing world economy
and expanding trade between nations will continue to shift
competitive advantages from industry sectors in one country
to those in another.
AHGA does not believe that removing the tariff would
threaten the jobs of U.S. timber workers. If it did, the
appropriate solution to the challenges of worker
displacement is the extension of unemployment benefits and
an expansion of trade adjustment assistance. AHGA supports
strengthening trade adjustment assistance programs; in
particular by expanding funding for worker retraining so
displaced workers can qualify for employment in growing
industries.
AHGA is disappointed by the support of the U.S. Commerce
Department for these tariffs on softwood lumber from Canada.
“This Administration has been supportive of homeowners in
many ways, most notably in the Justice Department’s worthy
antitrust efforts to prevent the National Association of
Realtors and state real estate associations from denying
home buyers and home sellers choice in real estate
services”, observed Hahn. “We wish they would be more
supportive on this issue as well.”
Those most affected will be first time new home homebuyers
and those who would otherwise barely qualify for home
ownership. Their purchases will be delayed until their
earnings increase. In the meantime they will lose the
opportunity to build equity in a home they could have owned.
A recent trend toward increases in mortgage interest rates
will also keep home ownership out of reach for many of them.
While others will still be able to buy a home, many of them
will be paying interest for 30 years on the $1,000 home
price increase resulting from the tariff. The increase in
cost for lumber in home additions and other remodeling
projects would also increase substantially, and many of the
nation’s 75 million homeowners would pay the price.
top
Home Values Softening
Data shows that home values are softening in many markets.
Inventories are up in most areas, and a number of factors
suggest that the era of double digit home appreciation is
over. This is not as bad as it might sound. It will have
little practical impact on many homeowners, just as the
price appreciation of homes over recent years has had less
effect than many imagine.
Rising tides lift all ships, and when American homeowners
have gone to buy a bigger boat (i.e. house) in recent years
they simply found the difference in price between theirs and
that bigger boat hadn’t changed much. They still needed to
come up with as much cash or finance that much larger a
mortgage. Happily, thanks to low mortgage rates and easy
mortgage credit, home financing was not a problem until
recently.
Some homeowners have made out well. Those selling their
homes and moving to less expensive housing markets over the
last couple years (especially retirees) have done quite
well. The huge rates of appreciation also brought smiles to
home investors who have cashed in or are getting ready to.
And local governments have benefited greatly from the surge
in real estate tax revenues resulting from home
appreciation. Many local governments have even loudly touted
recent slight reductions in real estate tax rates,
conveniently overlooking the fact that the net real estate
tax paid by the average homeowner is still rising
substantially.
The group that may have done most poorly are recent first
time buyers in weakening markets. Those who paid top dollar
may find that any equity they had may have vanished, and
some may be “upside down”, owing more than the home is
worth. Perhaps even worse, some of them will soon face
significant mortgage rate increases if they have adjustable
loans with very brief initial fixed rates. Their
predecessors who have been in their home three years or more
are much better off, even if they also have adjustable rate
loans that will soon move into adjustment mode. Those buyers
now have enough of a pad through home appreciation, that
they will still have substantial equity even if the market
softens. Those with adjustable rate mortgages who may in the
future have to sell because of unaffordable rate increases
will end up with thousands of dollars in net profit for
their efforts.
We believe the biggest losers in the coming year may be
future first time buyers, who may now have to sit on the
sidelines several years longer than previously. Mortgage
rates will creep up in 2006, offsetting much if not all of
any softening of home prices. Mortgage lenders are also
tightening lending standards, both because the Comptroller
of the Currency has been pressuring them to do so and
because changing real estate economy dictates more
conservative lending practices.
As appreciation slows or stops it becomes far more risky for
lenders to make no down payment or low down payment loans,
or offer marginally qualified borrowers extremely low
interest rate adjustable rate loans with very short terms
before the rates are adjusted (probably upward). “If lenders
make those kinds of loans today many will end up owning
homes that are worth less than the foreclosed loan balance”
said American Homeowners Foundation President Bruce Hahn.
Fortunately for lenders and first time buyers who have been
in their homes a few years there’s enough home equity to
payoff the lender and leave extra cash for most owners,
should the homeowner be forced to sell their home because of
upward rate adjustments or other factors.
The down side to first time buyers slowing their entry into
the market will be its ripple effect. Homeowners who want to
move up from their first and current starter home, will need
a first time buyer to buy their home if they are to move up
to a bigger home. With fewer first time buyers there will be
fewer move up buyers. The same applies at the next level.
The decline in the number of future first time buyers will
therefore probably add downward pressure on home values at
every level (except for the millionaire mansions) and
increase the time it takes to sell a home in 2006.
top
S tates Going After Foreclosure Scamsters
One of the worst forms of mortgage fraud are con artists who
assume the appearance of legitimate financial counselors.
Many charitable organizations, who try to help poor and
often unsophisticated homeowners, will provide financial
counseling, often free, and can often prevent families from
falling into foreclosure.
Some private businesses provide the same kinds of services,
and some of them do a good job. Unfortunately not all of the
mortgage rescuers have the homeowner’s best interests in
mind. Some charge thousands of dollars for negotiating with
the homeowner's creditors, but they do little or no work and
leave the homeowner in worse economic condition than before
they started. The worst of them will try to convince
homeowners to deed their homes to investors for a year,
ostensibly to provide homeowners time to clear up their
credit and refinance and reassume ownership of the property.
While such arrangements may be legal, many times the
counselors use this approach to acquire homes at below
market value and the homeowners wind up becoming tenants and
then being evicted because there was virtually no chance
they could keep up with payments.
Legislation was introduced in Illinois aimed at stopping con
artists who promise to bail out cash-strapped families but
often end up taking their homes instead, according to the
Chicago Tribune. Illinois’s Mortgage Rescue Fraud Prevention
Act requires consultants to provide homeowners with a
written contract disclosing the services that will be
provided. Homeowners could cancel the contract any time
before the services were performed, and violators would be
subject to criminal penalties for violations of the law.
Similar legislation has been introduced in Colorado and New
York. They follow Maryland and Minnesota which passed laws
protecting consumers from these scams in 2004 and 2005 and
California has had a similar law for a number of years.
top
Homeowner Tips and Tools
Here’s ways to:
1. Help you sell your home.
2. Help you plan for retirement.
3. Help you avoid spyware and other malicious computer
programs.
1. There’s a new website that can help homeowners sell
their home. Started by the founder of Expedia,
Zillow.com has launched a beta real estate site, offering
free, unbiased valuations on more than 40 million homes
across the United States, with data on an additional 20
million homes. This includes most homes in the country, not
just those for sale. All consumers need to do is enter an
address.
In addition to finding a valuation, value for homes,
consumers can access and view – for free – an enormous
amount of information on individual homes, including:
●
Historical value changes for each home, charted over the
past year, five years or ten years.
●
Historical value changes for each home as compared to its
surrounding zip code, city, state or the entire U.S.
●
All comparable home sales in an area.
●
Satellite, aerial and parcel views of many homes.
Individual home data, such as number of bedrooms/bathrooms,
square footage, lot size, stories and year built.
Finding this information on Zillow.com is free, and does not
require anyone to enter any personal information.
Additionally, Zillow’s My ZestimatorTM tool allows users to
refine the value of a home for their own use, based on
changes or additions to that home. For example, a seller
with a recently remodeled kitchen can refine her value based
on this change. Zillow calculates the remodel value for her
area based on local remodel data and depreciation.
These home valuation estimates can help home sellers in
several ways. Inexperienced real estate agents may not be
good at determining fair market values and Zillow provides a
yardstick for comparison. In addition, some real estate
agents may give home sellers a lowball home valuation if
they don’t think they have competition for the listing. This
helps them get a quick sale, but the home seller may be
forgoing profits. There is substantial evidence that this
may not be uncommon. In his recent book Freakonomics,
University of Chicago professor Dr. Steven D. Levitt
determined that real estate agents on average got 4% more
for their own home than they did for their clients owning
similar homes).
Some real estate agents sometimes purposely inflate the
value of a home as well. Some homeowners start out with
unrealistically high expectations about the value of their
homes. If an agent is competing with other agents for a
listing with such a homeowner one of them might be tempted
to deliberately overestimate the value of a home just to get
the listing. After it languishes on the market for a while,
the agent can come back with a suggested “price correction”,
but in the meantime the homeowner may have wasted valuable
time.
Zillow can also provide other tools and the confidence that
home sellers may need to sell their home without a real
estate agent or through the use of a discount agent. Keep in
mind that Zillow is still a “beta” website, which is geek
speak for a work in process. Those who have tried it say
that in some areas it provides very accurate valuations
while in others (particularly more rural) the formulas used
to compute the valuations need more tweaking. Nevertheless
it is built on 2 terabytes of data (geek speak for “lots”),
has plenty of investment funding to keep working at it until
it get those formulas right, is run by a successful Internet
veteran, and the company has said upfront that it won’t stop
until it gets its formulas right.
2. Torrid Technologies
offers an inexpensive ($89 for the personal edition,
$169 for the couples version), user friendly, reasonably
accurate retirement planning software that we highly
recommend to homeowners who are either beginning to think
about financial/retirement planning or would like a tool to
track the progress of their planning. The company reports
that 94% of their users said in a poll that they would
definitely recommend this program to their friends and
colleagues. AHGA President Bruce Hahn first learned of it
several years ago in a financial planning magazine where it
was the top recommended software among “budget” financial
planning software. He has been using it for 3 years and has
found it to be a very useful benchmarking tool.
The main value of Torrid Technologies’ Retirement Savings
Planner is to help consumers focus on the investments and
returns necessary to achieve the desired level of retirement
income. The user determines the desired age of retirement,
the amount of desired retirement income in today’s dollars,
and must also make assumptions about the return on
investments and inflation. The former is a subjective
estimate that relates to investment style (appropriately so,
since this will vary and investment advisors generally
recommend more risk taking earlier in a career and a more
conservative approach in later years). There is plenty of
historical data on inflation on which you can base an
inflation factor. Plug in information about your estimated
social security benefits and any estimated pension benefits,
and the software will tell you how long your investments
will last until you reach a shortfall between income and
expenses.
A common temptation will be to assume an early retirement
age and a conservative return on investment and see how long
until you are in the red (not long, as it turned out when we
tried that). All of the assumptions can be modified and the
numbers can be rerun at any time. When we increased our
projected savings and investment return rate (still keeping
both within reason), and pushed the retirement age back a
couple years, the results looked much better.
And changing the numbers in subsequent years, when our
financial results exceeded our projections, produced even
more pleasant results. In the latter regard it also serves
as a tracking tool, because the software protocol continues
to recompute how long your savings will last based on your
ongoing updates. If things are going well the software will
keep pushing back that date. When you get to the point that
you will not run out of cash until age 99 based on
reasonable assumptions, there’s a pretty good chance you’re
in good financial shape. And that will give you a pretty
good feeling.
This software does not provide investment advice, nor can it
help you with specific investment plans. The couples edition
may not be necessary if only one family member is working.
There is also a $699 professional edition, which we have not
tried. For specific investment advice you’ll need advice
from experts. You can Google many excellent articles on how
pick them. There are similar types of software that are more
sophisticated, but they are substantially more expensive.
However it is an excellent and very inexpensive way to track
your progress on your voyage to financial freedom.
3. A group, including Harvard and Oxford universities and
Google, has unveiled a campaign against spyware and other
malicious computer programs that can steal personal
information, snoop on your Web surfing and bombard you with
pop-up ads.
The coalition, is also receiving input from Consumer Reports
WebWatch. It has created a Web site -
http://www.stopbadware.org - to list programs that
infect unsuspecting users who can check the site to see
whether something is dangerous before downloading it. The
coalition intends to publicly expose firms that make the
software in an effort to shame them, and will gather data
that could lay the groundwork for class-action lawsuits
against them. Some programs track every keystroke on your
computer and steal credit card, bank account and Social
Security numbers. Some are also coded to prevent detection
by virus protection or other malware detection software.
"For too long, unscrupulous companies have made millions of
dollars infecting our computers with malicious software,"
noted John Palfrey, executive director of Harvard Law
School's Berkman Center for Internet and Society and
co-director of the Stop Badware Coalition. "This is so
dangerous because there are intruders in your house, but you
don't know that they are in there or how they got there."
The coalition also intends to reduce the use of adware which
launches pop-up ads and can track Web-surfing habits.
Definitions of such software vary widely, and this coalition
refers to as "badware," which it defines as malicious
software that subverts a computer's operations to benefit a
third party. Others use the term “malware” to define it.
"These people out there are very important to Google. They
are our customer base," said Vinton G. Cerf, a Google vice
president and an early leader in the Internet revolution.
"So our interest is very strong in doing anything we can to
help defend against this sort of abusive behavior."
Separately, Microsoft Corp. introduced a free test version
of anti-spyware software last year, and has announced plans
to integrate its new Windows Defender anti-spyware product
in its new Vista operating system. Microsoft will also give
it free to Windows XP users.
Congress has passed legislation to address spam and other
specific components of “badware” or “malware”, and spyware
legislation is currently pending. AHGA supports this
legislation but is also urging a broader approach. “Who
knows what the bad guys will think of next?” noted AHGA
President Bruce Hahn. “We started with spam and viruses, and
now we have spyware, worms and a host of other problems
threatening our computers. Congress should pass a law
criminalizing actions to put software code on computers
without the owner’s knowledge and advance permission. If it
did not come installed (and fully disclosed) from the
computer manufacturer, and I did not put it on or give
informed consent for a third party to put it on my computer,
then it shouldn’t be in my computer”, Hahn concluded.
top
|

Do you have a little spare time over the next month? Many
state and federal legislators will be home during the
President’s Day recess. It’s a great time to express your
views to members of Congress and state legislatures on the
issues contained in this month’s edition of Home Base, as
well as other policy issues important to you.
Many legislators also reserve office hours when they are
available in their home state or home district offices to
meet with constituents to discuss policy issues. You may be
able to arrange a personal meeting while they are home.
To find out federal legislator’s schedules you can call the
Congressional switchboard at 202-225-3121 and ask to be
connected to your Representative or either of your Senators.
To look up the phone number and send an email to your U.S.
Representative or your U.S. Senators,
click here. The site can look up their names for you if
you don’t know them. |